DFTT vs. DMAY

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

DFTT (DF Tactical 30 ETF) and DMAY (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - DFTT tracks the DF Risk-Managed Tactical Top 30 Index while DMAY tracks the Cboe S&P 500 30% (-5% to -35%) Buffer Protect May Series Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DFTT charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for DMAY.

Performance

DFTT vs. DMAY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DF Tactical 30 ETF (DFTT) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May (DMAY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFTT achieves a 22.90% return, which is significantly higher than DMAY's 3.20% return.

DFTT

• 1D: -0.93%
• 1M: 2.95%
• YTD: 22.90%
• 6M: 20.64%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DMAY

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: -0.56%
• YTD: 3.20%
• 6M: 3.06%
• 1Y: 9.84%
• 3Y*: 11.21%
• 5Y*: 6.75%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFTT vs. DMAY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DFTT DF Tactical 30 ETF	22.90%	-0.00%
DMAY FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May	3.20%	1.32%

Correlation

The correlation between DFTT and DMAY is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2025	0.77

DFTT vs. DMAY - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DFTT	DMAY
Technology	51.0%	39.0%
Communication Services	17.2%	10.6%
Financial Services	16.1%	11.1%
Industrials	11.3%	7.8%
Healthcare	2.2%	8.3%
Utilities	1.9%	2.1%
Basic Materials	-	1.7%
Consumer Cyclical	-	9.9%
Consumer Defensive	-	4.5%
Energy	-	3.1%
Real Estate	-	1.8%

Return for Risk

DFTT vs. DMAY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFTT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DMAY

DMAY Risk / Return Rank: 76
DMAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
DMAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
DMAY Omega Ratio Rank: 82
DMAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
DMAY Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFTT vs. DMAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DF Tactical 30 ETF (DFTT) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May (DMAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DFTT	DMAY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.98	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.88	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.43	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.96	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	16.35	—

Drawdowns

DFTT vs. DMAY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFTT drawdown since its inception was -10.46%, smaller than the maximum DMAY drawdown of -13.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFTT and DMAY.

Drawdown Indicators

	DFTT	DMAY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.46%	-13.90%	+3.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-3.36%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-12.38%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-13.90%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.16%	-1.47%	-3.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.18%	-2.23%	+0.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.61%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DFTT	DMAY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.26%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	4.30%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.84%	5.08%	+18.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.84%	9.06%	+14.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.84%	8.43%	+15.41%

DFTT vs. DMAY - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFTT has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than DMAY's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

DFTT vs. DMAY - Dividend Comparison

Neither DFTT nor DMAY has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DFTT and DMAY in my portfolio?

DFTT and DMAY have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, DFTT or DMAY?

On fees, DFTT is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DFTT or DMAY?

DFTT is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DMAY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DFTT or DMAY?

DFTT and DMAY have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between DFTT and DMAY?

DFTT tracks DF Risk-Managed Tactical Top 30 Index, while DMAY tracks Cboe S&P 500 30% (-5% to -35%) Buffer Protect May Series Index. They also come from different issuers: Donoghue Forlines and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for DFTT and 0.85% for DMAY.