DFTT vs. BLCR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DFTT (DF Tactical 30 ETF) and BLCR (Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. DFTT is passively managed, while BLCR is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DFTT charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for BLCR.

Performance

DFTT vs. BLCR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DF Tactical 30 ETF (DFTT) and Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFTT achieves a 23.44% return, which is significantly higher than BLCR's 19.56% return.

DFTT

• 1D: 1.22%
• 1M: 10.43%
• YTD: 23.44%
• 6M: 24.69%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BLCR

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: 6.16%
• YTD: 19.56%
• 6M: 21.53%
• 1Y: 47.09%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFTT vs. BLCR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DFTT DF Tactical 30 ETF	23.44%	-0.04%
BLCR Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF	19.56%	1.02%

Correlation

The correlation between DFTT and BLCR is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2025	0.86

DFTT vs. BLCR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DFTT	BLCR
Technology	51.0%	35.7%
Communication Services	17.2%	11.0%
Financial Services	16.1%	12.1%
Industrials	11.3%	13.5%
Healthcare	2.2%	7.6%
Utilities	1.9%	1.6%
Basic Materials	-	2.2%
Consumer Cyclical	-	10.9%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	2.2%
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

DFTT vs. BLCR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLCR

BLCR Risk / Return Rank: 87
BLCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
BLCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
BLCR Omega Ratio Rank: 85
BLCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
BLCR Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFTT vs. BLCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DF Tactical 30 ETF (DFTT) and Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DFTT	BLCR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	3.05	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.11	1.90	+0.22

Drawdowns

DFTT vs. BLCR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFTT drawdown since its inception was -10.46%, smaller than the maximum BLCR drawdown of -21.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFTT and BLCR.

Drawdown Indicators

	DFTT	BLCR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.46%	-21.29%	+10.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-10.26%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.37%	+0.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.23%	-2.19%	-0.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.16%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DFTT	BLCR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.45%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	12.24%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.26%	15.54%	+6.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.26%	17.47%	+4.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.26%	17.47%	+4.79%

DFTT vs. BLCR - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFTT has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than BLCR's 0.36% expense ratio.

Dividends

DFTT vs. BLCR - Dividend Comparison

DFTT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BLCR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BLCR Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF	0.23%	0.33%	0.75%	0.13%
DFTT DF Tactical 30 ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DFTT and BLCR in my portfolio?

DFTT and BLCR have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, DFTT or BLCR?

On fees, BLCR is cheaper at 0.36% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DFTT or BLCR?

BLCR is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for DFTT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DFTT or BLCR?

BLCR has the higher dividend yield at 0.23%, compared with 0.00% for DFTT.

What is the main difference between DFTT and BLCR?

They also come from different issuers: Donoghue Forlines and BlackRock. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for DFTT and 0.36% for BLCR.