PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFTEX vs. JMABX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFTEX vs. JMABX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA Intermediate-Term Extended Quality Portfolio Fund (DFTEX) and John Hancock Managed Account Shares Investment-Grade Corporate Bond Portfolio (JMABX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFTEX achieves a -0.32% return, which is significantly lower than JMABX's -0.18% return.


DFTEX

1D
-0.21%
1M
-1.56%
6M
-0.71%
YTD
-0.32%
1Y
2.28%
3Y*
5.39%
5Y*
-0.09%
10Y*
2.08%
ALL TIME*
2.57%

JMABX

1D
-0.11%
1M
-1.25%
6M
-0.53%
YTD
-0.18%
1Y
2.86%
3Y*
5.61%
5Y*
0.48%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

DFTEX vs. JMABX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
DFTEX
DFA Intermediate-Term Extended Quality Portfolio Fund
-0.32%7.70%2.89%9.61%-16.28%-2.05%10.26%3.47%
JMABX
John Hancock Managed Account Shares Investment-Grade Corporate Bond Portfolio
-0.18%8.88%4.42%8.05%-15.50%0.33%7.74%2.72%

Correlation

The correlation between DFTEX and JMABX is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2019

0.91

The correlation between DFTEX and JMABX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFTEX vs. JMABX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DFTEX
DFTEX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
DFTEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFTEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFTEX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
DFTEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFTEX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

JMABX
JMABX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
JMABX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMABX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMABX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
JMABX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMABX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DFTEX vs. JMABX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Intermediate-Term Extended Quality Portfolio Fund (DFTEX) and John Hancock Managed Account Shares Investment-Grade Corporate Bond Portfolio (JMABX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DFTEXJMABXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.18

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.95

1.20

-0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.79

3.86

-1.07

DFTEX vs. JMABX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFTEX Sharpe Ratio is 0.73, which is comparable to the JMABX Sharpe Ratio of 1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFTEX and JMABX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DFTEX vs. JMABX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFTEX drawdown since its inception was -22.83%, which is greater than JMABX's maximum drawdown of -21.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFTEX and JMABX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFTEXJMABXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.83%

-21.48%

-1.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.22%

-2.89%

-0.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.50%

-5.27%

+0.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.56%

-21.43%

-1.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.10%

-1.64%

-0.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.42%

-6.06%

+1.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.08%

0.89%

+0.19%

Volatility

DFTEX vs. JMABX - Volatility Comparison

DFA Intermediate-Term Extended Quality Portfolio Fund (DFTEX) has a higher volatility of 1.04% compared to John Hancock Managed Account Shares Investment-Grade Corporate Bond Portfolio (JMABX) at 0.84%. This indicates that DFTEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JMABX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFTEXJMABXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.04%

0.84%

+0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.27%

2.69%

+0.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.16%

3.50%

+0.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.68%

5.51%

+1.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.88%

5.83%

+0.05%

DFTEX vs. JMABX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFTEX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than JMABX's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DFTEX vs. JMABX - Dividend Comparison

DFTEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.19%, which matches JMABX's 5.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFTEX
DFA Intermediate-Term Extended Quality Portfolio Fund
5.19%4.30%4.27%3.79%3.25%4.12%3.31%3.06%3.24%2.91%2.88%3.90%
JMABX
John Hancock Managed Account Shares Investment-Grade Corporate Bond Portfolio
5.21%5.59%5.26%3.59%3.28%3.99%2.74%0.80%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFTEX and JMABX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DFTEX has higher volatility (1.04%) compared to JMABX (0.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFTEX dropped -22.83% vs JMABX's -21.48%.

JMABX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.00 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFTEX and JMABX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer