DFSV vs. BSCMX
DFSV (Dimensional US Small Cap Value ETF) and BSCMX (Brandes Small Cap Value Fund) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 3 years, DFSV returned 16.87%/yr vs 25.45%/yr for BSCMX. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DFSV charges 0.31%/yr vs 0.91%/yr for BSCMX.
Performance
DFSV vs. BSCMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with DFSV having a 15.01% return and BSCMX slightly higher at 15.67%.
DFSV
- 1D
- -0.84%
- 1M
- 1.32%
- YTD
- 15.01%
- 6M
- 14.63%
- 1Y
- 33.99%
- 3Y*
- 16.87%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BSCMX
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 1.80%
- YTD
- 15.67%
- 6M
- 17.50%
- 1Y
- 41.78%
- 3Y*
- 25.45%
- 5Y*
- 15.52%
- 10Y*
- —
DFSV vs. BSCMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFSV Dimensional US Small Cap Value ETF | 15.01% | 8.59% | 7.13% | 19.26% | 0.60% |
BSCMX Brandes Small Cap Value Fund | 15.67% | 23.51% | 24.77% | 22.75% | -5.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFSV and BSCMX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2022 | 0.88 |
The correlation between DFSV and BSCMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFSV vs. BSCMX — Risk / Return Rank
DFSV
BSCMX
DFSV vs. BSCMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional US Small Cap Value ETF (DFSV) and Brandes Small Cap Value Fund (BSCMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFSV | BSCMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.43 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.64 | 4.59 | -0.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.57 | 15.58 | -4.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFSV | BSCMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.95 | 2.55 | -0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.70 | -0.17 |
Drawdowns
DFSV vs. BSCMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFSV drawdown since its inception was -28.02%, smaller than the maximum BSCMX drawdown of -38.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFSV and BSCMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFSV | BSCMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.02% | -38.12% | +10.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.39% | -9.65% | +0.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.02% | -22.34% | -5.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.84% | -1.28% | +0.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.71% | -6.04% | -0.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.95% | 2.83% | +0.12% |
Volatility
DFSV vs. BSCMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Dimensional US Small Cap Value ETF (DFSV) is 3.95%, while Brandes Small Cap Value Fund (BSCMX) has a volatility of 4.57%. This indicates that DFSV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BSCMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFSV | BSCMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.95% | 4.57% | -0.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.28% | 11.66% | -0.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.63% | 17.35% | +0.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.24% | 17.89% | +4.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.24% | 20.60% | +1.64% |
DFSV vs. BSCMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFSV has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is lower than BSCMX's 0.91% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFSV vs. BSCMX - Dividend Comparison
DFSV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, less than BSCMX's 3.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCMX Brandes Small Cap Value Fund | 3.93% | 4.54% | 2.31% | 3.50% | 2.93% | 4.38% | 1.76% | 1.11% | 9.02% |
DFSV Dimensional US Small Cap Value ETF | 1.42% | 1.53% | 1.31% | 1.29% | 0.90% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFSV and BSCMX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BSCMX has higher volatility (4.57%) compared to DFSV (3.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFSV dropped -28.02% vs BSCMX's -38.12%.
BSCMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFSV and BSCMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer