DFSU vs. SCHX
DFSU (Dimensional US Sustainability Core 1 ETF) and SCHX (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. DFSU is actively managed, while SCHX is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DFSU returned 19.48%/yr vs 21.28%/yr for SCHX. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. DFSU charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHX.
Performance
DFSU vs. SCHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFSU achieves a 6.81% return, which is significantly lower than SCHX's 9.45% return.
DFSU
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 6.81%
- 6M
- 5.89%
- 1Y
- 23.42%
- 3Y*
- 19.48%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHX
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- 0.14%
- YTD
- 9.45%
- 6M
- 8.85%
- 1Y
- 25.85%
- 3Y*
- 21.28%
- 5Y*
- 12.86%
- 10Y*
- 15.62%
DFSU vs. SCHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFSU Dimensional US Sustainability Core 1 ETF | 6.81% | 15.65% | 22.96% | 26.27% | 0.90% |
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 9.45% | 17.46% | 24.88% | 26.84% | -0.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFSU and SCHX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2022 | 0.97 |
The correlation between DFSU and SCHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
DFSU vs. SCHX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DFSU
SCHX
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
DFSU
SCHX
Technology
DFSU
SCHX
Industrials
DFSU
SCHX
Communication Services
DFSU
SCHX
Healthcare
DFSU
SCHX
Consumer Cyclical
DFSU
SCHX
Consumer Defensive
DFSU
SCHX
Basic Materials
DFSU
SCHX
Energy
DFSU
SCHX
Utilities
DFSU
SCHX
Real Estate
DFSU
SCHX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFSU vs. SCHX — Risk / Return Rank
DFSU
SCHX
DFSU vs. SCHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional US Sustainability Core 1 ETF (DFSU) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DFSU | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.37 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.32 | 2.88 | -0.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.02 | 12.67 | -2.65 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DFSU vs. SCHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFSU drawdown since its inception was -19.88%, smaller than the maximum SCHX drawdown of -34.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFSU and SCHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFSU | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.88% | -34.33% | +14.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.12% | -9.02% | -1.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.88% | -19.04% | -0.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.24% | -1.84% | +0.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.64% | -3.96% | +1.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.34% | 2.05% | +0.29% |
Volatility
DFSU vs. SCHX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Dimensional US Sustainability Core 1 ETF (DFSU) is 4.16%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) has a volatility of 4.71%. This indicates that DFSU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFSU | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.16% | 4.71% | -0.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.21% | 9.86% | +0.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.36% | 12.60% | +0.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.26% | 17.22% | -0.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.26% | 18.20% | -1.94% |
DFSU vs. SCHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFSU has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHX's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
DFSU vs. SCHX - Dividend Comparison
DFSU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, less than SCHX's 1.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFSU Dimensional US Sustainability Core 1 ETF | 0.83% | 0.85% | 0.96% | 1.03% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 1.02% | 1.09% | 1.22% | 1.39% | 1.64% | 1.22% | 1.64% | 1.82% | 2.02% | 1.70% | 1.92% | 2.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, DFSU and SCHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SCHX has higher volatility (4.71%) compared to DFSU (4.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFSU dropped -19.88% vs SCHX's -34.33%.
On 3-year performance, SCHX leads with 21.28% vs 19.48% for DFSU. On fees, SCHX is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, DFSU has been the lower-risk option at 4.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SCHX has performed better with a 21.28% return vs 19.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHX is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for DFSU.
SCHX has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.83% for DFSU.
They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for DFSU and 0.03% for SCHX.
SCHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFSU and SCHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer