PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFSU vs. ITOT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFSU vs. ITOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional US Sustainability Core 1 ETF (DFSU) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFSU achieves a 8.15% return, which is significantly lower than ITOT's 11.78% return.


DFSU

1D
0.78%
1M
3.97%
YTD
8.15%
6M
7.93%
1Y
24.54%
3Y*
20.74%
5Y*
10Y*

ITOT

1D
0.48%
1M
4.64%
YTD
11.78%
6M
11.52%
1Y
28.81%
3Y*
22.39%
5Y*
12.80%
10Y*
15.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFSU vs. ITOT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
DFSU
Dimensional US Sustainability Core 1 ETF
8.15%15.65%22.96%26.27%0.65%
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
11.78%17.00%23.80%26.12%2.14%

Correlation

The correlation between DFSU and ITOT is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2022

0.98

The correlation between DFSU and ITOT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

DFSU vs. ITOT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DFSU
ITOT

Technology

28.7%
33.8%

Financial Services

16.7%
12.1%

Industrials

12.1%
9.5%

Consumer Cyclical

12.0%
10.1%

Communication Services

10.4%
10.3%

Healthcare

10.2%
9.0%

Consumer Defensive

4.3%
4.7%

Basic Materials

2.3%
2.1%

Energy

2.0%
3.7%

Utilities

1.0%
2.3%

Real Estate

0.3%
2.4%

Technology

DFSU
28.7%
ITOT
33.8%

Financial Services

DFSU
16.7%
ITOT
12.1%

Industrials

DFSU
12.1%
ITOT
9.5%

Consumer Cyclical

DFSU
12.0%
ITOT
10.1%

Communication Services

DFSU
10.4%
ITOT
10.3%

Healthcare

DFSU
10.2%
ITOT
9.0%

Consumer Defensive

DFSU
4.3%
ITOT
4.7%

Basic Materials

DFSU
2.3%
ITOT
2.1%

Energy

DFSU
2.0%
ITOT
3.7%

Utilities

DFSU
1.0%
ITOT
2.3%

Real Estate

DFSU
0.3%
ITOT
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFSU vs. ITOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFSU
DFSU Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
DFSU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFSU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFSU Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
DFSU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFSU Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

ITOT
ITOT Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
ITOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITOT Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
ITOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITOT Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFSU vs. ITOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional US Sustainability Core 1 ETF (DFSU) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFSUITOTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.43

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.44

3.25

-0.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.59

14.92

-4.34

DFSU vs. ITOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFSU Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is comparable to the ITOT Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFSU and ITOT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFSUITOTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.89

2.37

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.27

0.57

+0.70

Drawdowns

DFSU vs. ITOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFSU drawdown since its inception was -19.88%, smaller than the maximum ITOT drawdown of -55.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFSU and ITOT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFSUITOTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.88%

-55.20%

+35.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.12%

-8.90%

-1.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.88%

-19.44%

-0.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.25%

+0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.66%

-6.97%

+4.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.32%

1.94%

+0.38%

Volatility

DFSU vs. ITOT - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional US Sustainability Core 1 ETF (DFSU) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) have volatilities of 3.02% and 2.94%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFSUITOTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.02%

2.94%

+0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.69%

9.14%

+0.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.02%

12.19%

+0.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.24%

17.35%

-1.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.24%

18.26%

-2.02%

DFSU vs. ITOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFSU has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than ITOT's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DFSU vs. ITOT - Dividend Comparison

DFSU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than ITOT's 0.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFSU
Dimensional US Sustainability Core 1 ETF
0.82%0.85%0.96%1.03%0.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
0.97%1.11%1.23%1.47%1.66%1.18%1.41%1.88%2.14%1.69%1.83%2.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, DFSU and ITOT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DFSU has higher volatility (3.02%) compared to ITOT (2.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFSU dropped -19.88% vs ITOT's -55.20%.

On 3-year performance, ITOT leads with 22.39% vs 20.74% for DFSU. On fees, ITOT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, ITOT has performed better with a 22.39% return vs 20.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ITOT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for DFSU.

ITOT has the higher dividend yield at 0.97%, compared with 0.82% for DFSU.

They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for DFSU and 0.03% for ITOT.

ITOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFSU and ITOT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer