DFSU vs. ITOT
DFSU (Dimensional US Sustainability Core 1 ETF) and ITOT (iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. DFSU is actively managed, while ITOT is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DFSU returned 20.74%/yr vs 22.39%/yr for ITOT. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. DFSU charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for ITOT.
Performance
DFSU vs. ITOT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFSU achieves a 8.15% return, which is significantly lower than ITOT's 11.78% return.
DFSU
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- 3.97%
- YTD
- 8.15%
- 6M
- 7.93%
- 1Y
- 24.54%
- 3Y*
- 20.74%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ITOT
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 4.64%
- YTD
- 11.78%
- 6M
- 11.52%
- 1Y
- 28.81%
- 3Y*
- 22.39%
- 5Y*
- 12.80%
- 10Y*
- 15.01%
DFSU vs. ITOT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFSU Dimensional US Sustainability Core 1 ETF | 8.15% | 15.65% | 22.96% | 26.27% | 0.65% |
ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | 11.78% | 17.00% | 23.80% | 26.12% | 2.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFSU and ITOT is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2022 | 0.98 |
The correlation between DFSU and ITOT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
DFSU vs. ITOT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DFSU
ITOT
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
DFSU
ITOT
Financial Services
DFSU
ITOT
Industrials
DFSU
ITOT
Consumer Cyclical
DFSU
ITOT
Communication Services
DFSU
ITOT
Healthcare
DFSU
ITOT
Consumer Defensive
DFSU
ITOT
Basic Materials
DFSU
ITOT
Energy
DFSU
ITOT
Utilities
DFSU
ITOT
Real Estate
DFSU
ITOT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFSU vs. ITOT — Risk / Return Rank
DFSU
ITOT
DFSU vs. ITOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional US Sustainability Core 1 ETF (DFSU) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFSU | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.43 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.44 | 3.25 | -0.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.59 | 14.92 | -4.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFSU | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.89 | 2.37 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.74 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.27 | 0.57 | +0.70 |
Drawdowns
DFSU vs. ITOT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFSU drawdown since its inception was -19.88%, smaller than the maximum ITOT drawdown of -55.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFSU and ITOT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFSU | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.88% | -55.20% | +35.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.12% | -8.90% | -1.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.88% | -19.44% | -0.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.25% | +0.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.66% | -6.97% | +4.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.32% | 1.94% | +0.38% |
Volatility
DFSU vs. ITOT - Volatility Comparison
Dimensional US Sustainability Core 1 ETF (DFSU) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) have volatilities of 3.02% and 2.94%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFSU | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.02% | 2.94% | +0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.69% | 9.14% | +0.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.02% | 12.19% | +0.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.24% | 17.35% | -1.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.24% | 18.26% | -2.02% |
DFSU vs. ITOT - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFSU has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than ITOT's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
DFSU vs. ITOT - Dividend Comparison
DFSU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than ITOT's 0.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFSU Dimensional US Sustainability Core 1 ETF | 0.82% | 0.85% | 0.96% | 1.03% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | 0.97% | 1.11% | 1.23% | 1.47% | 1.66% | 1.18% | 1.41% | 1.88% | 2.14% | 1.69% | 1.83% | 2.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, DFSU and ITOT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
DFSU has higher volatility (3.02%) compared to ITOT (2.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFSU dropped -19.88% vs ITOT's -55.20%.
On 3-year performance, ITOT leads with 22.39% vs 20.74% for DFSU. On fees, ITOT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, ITOT has performed better with a 22.39% return vs 20.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ITOT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for DFSU.
ITOT has the higher dividend yield at 0.97%, compared with 0.82% for DFSU.
They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for DFSU and 0.03% for ITOT.
ITOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFSU and ITOT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer