PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFSU vs. ESN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFSU vs. ESN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional US Sustainability Core 1 ETF (DFSU) and Essential 40 Stock ETF (ESN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFSU achieves a 9.05% return, which is significantly lower than ESN's 16.65% return.


DFSU

1D
0.67%
1M
0.46%
6M
7.52%
YTD
9.05%
1Y
20.83%
3Y*
17.72%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
19.95%

ESN

1D
0.28%
1M
-0.26%
6M
12.11%
YTD
16.65%
1Y
27.64%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
16.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$4.41M$4.49M$4.28M
$2.17M$1.60M$1.63M

DFSU vs. ESN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
DFSU
Dimensional US Sustainability Core 1 ETF
9.05%15.65%0.08%
ESN
Essential 40 Stock ETF
16.65%16.52%-3.53%

Correlation

The correlation between DFSU and ESN is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2024

0.81

The correlation between DFSU and ESN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFSU vs. ESN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DFSU
DFSU Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
DFSU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFSU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFSU Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
DFSU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFSU Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

ESN
ESN Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
ESN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESN Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESN Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
ESN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESN Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DFSU vs. ESN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional US Sustainability Core 1 ETF (DFSU) and Essential 40 Stock ETF (ESN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DFSUESNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.46

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.83

4.12

-2.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.85

16.52

-8.67

DFSU vs. ESN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFSU Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is lower than the ESN Sharpe Ratio of 2.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFSU and ESN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DFSU vs. ESN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFSU drawdown since its inception was -19.88%, which is greater than ESN's maximum drawdown of -13.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFSU and ESN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFSUESNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.88%

-13.60%

-6.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.12%

-6.42%

-3.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.90%

-0.53%

-0.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.59%

-1.81%

-0.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.36%

1.60%

+0.76%

Volatility

DFSU vs. ESN - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional US Sustainability Core 1 ETF (DFSU) has a higher volatility of 3.28% compared to Essential 40 Stock ETF (ESN) at 2.65%. This indicates that DFSU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFSUESNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.28%

2.65%

+0.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.25%

7.51%

+2.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.45%

9.98%

+3.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.12%

13.04%

+3.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.12%

13.04%

+3.08%

DFSU vs. ESN - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFSU has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than ESN's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFSU vs. ESN - Dividend Comparison

DFSU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, more than ESN's 0.78% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
DFSU
Dimensional US Sustainability Core 1 ETF
0.83%0.85%0.96%1.03%0.21%
ESN
Essential 40 Stock ETF
0.78%0.91%0.76%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFSU and ESN have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DFSU has higher volatility (3.28%) compared to ESN (2.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFSU dropped -19.88% vs ESN's -13.60%.

On 1-year performance, ESN leads with 27.64% vs 20.83% for DFSU. On fees, DFSU is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, ESN has been the lower-risk option at 2.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ESN has performed better with a 27.64% return vs 20.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DFSU is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for ESN.

DFSU has the higher dividend yield at 0.83%, compared with 0.78% for ESN.

They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and KKM. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for DFSU and 0.70% for ESN.

ESN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFSU and ESN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer