DFSU vs. ESN
DFSU (Dimensional US Sustainability Core 1 ETF) and ESN (Essential 40 Stock ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. DFSU is actively managed, while ESN is passively managed. Over the past year, DFSU returned 20.83% vs 27.64% for ESN. Their correlation of 0.81 means they have usually moved in the same direction. DFSU charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for ESN.
Performance
DFSU vs. ESN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFSU achieves a 9.05% return, which is significantly lower than ESN's 16.65% return.
DFSU
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- 0.46%
- 6M
- 7.52%
- YTD
- 9.05%
- 1Y
- 20.83%
- 3Y*
- 17.72%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 19.95%
ESN
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -0.26%
- 6M
- 12.11%
- YTD
- 16.65%
- 1Y
- 27.64%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 16.50%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $4.41M | $4.49M | $4.28M | |
| $2.17M | $1.60M | $1.63M |
DFSU vs. ESN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
DFSU Dimensional US Sustainability Core 1 ETF | 9.05% | 15.65% | 0.08% |
ESN Essential 40 Stock ETF | 16.65% | 16.52% | -3.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFSU and ESN is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2024 | 0.81 |
The correlation between DFSU and ESN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFSU vs. ESN — Risk / Return Rank
DFSU
ESN
DFSU vs. ESN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional US Sustainability Core 1 ETF (DFSU) and Essential 40 Stock ETF (ESN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DFSU | ESN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.46 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.83 | 4.12 | -2.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.85 | 16.52 | -8.67 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DFSU vs. ESN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFSU drawdown since its inception was -19.88%, which is greater than ESN's maximum drawdown of -13.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFSU and ESN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFSU | ESN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.88% | -13.60% | -6.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.12% | -6.42% | -3.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.88% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.90% | -0.53% | -0.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.59% | -1.81% | -0.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.36% | 1.60% | +0.76% |
Volatility
DFSU vs. ESN - Volatility Comparison
Dimensional US Sustainability Core 1 ETF (DFSU) has a higher volatility of 3.28% compared to Essential 40 Stock ETF (ESN) at 2.65%. This indicates that DFSU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFSU | ESN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.28% | 2.65% | +0.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.25% | 7.51% | +2.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.45% | 9.98% | +3.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.12% | 13.04% | +3.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.12% | 13.04% | +3.08% |
DFSU vs. ESN - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFSU has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than ESN's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFSU vs. ESN - Dividend Comparison
DFSU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, more than ESN's 0.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFSU Dimensional US Sustainability Core 1 ETF | 0.83% | 0.85% | 0.96% | 1.03% | 0.21% |
ESN Essential 40 Stock ETF | 0.78% | 0.91% | 0.76% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFSU and ESN have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DFSU has higher volatility (3.28%) compared to ESN (2.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFSU dropped -19.88% vs ESN's -13.60%.
On 1-year performance, ESN leads with 27.64% vs 20.83% for DFSU. On fees, DFSU is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, ESN has been the lower-risk option at 2.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ESN has performed better with a 27.64% return vs 20.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DFSU is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for ESN.
DFSU has the higher dividend yield at 0.83%, compared with 0.78% for ESN.
They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and KKM. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for DFSU and 0.70% for ESN.
ESN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFSU and ESN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer