PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFSTX vs. TISBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFSTX vs. TISBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA U.S. Small Cap Portfolio (DFSTX) and TIAA-CREF Small-Cap Blend Index Fund (TISBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFSTX achieves a 17.76% return, which is significantly lower than TISBX's 19.47% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with DFSTX having a 10.82% annualized return and TISBX not far behind at 10.62%.


DFSTX

1D
0.87%
1M
-0.47%
6M
11.70%
YTD
17.76%
1Y
29.40%
3Y*
13.92%
5Y*
9.16%
10Y*
10.82%
ALL TIME*
10.49%

TISBX

1D
1.35%
1M
-1.63%
6M
13.41%
YTD
19.47%
1Y
37.61%
3Y*
15.32%
5Y*
7.28%
10Y*
10.62%
ALL TIME*
9.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

DFSTX vs. TISBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DFSTX
DFA U.S. Small Cap Portfolio
17.76%8.07%11.50%17.66%-13.50%30.50%11.19%21.78%-13.20%11.19%
TISBX
TIAA-CREF Small-Cap Blend Index Fund
19.47%12.72%11.60%17.07%-20.31%14.85%20.14%25.61%-10.99%13.14%

Correlation

The correlation between DFSTX and TISBX is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2002

0.98

The correlation between DFSTX and TISBX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFSTX vs. TISBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DFSTX
DFSTX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
DFSTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFSTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFSTX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
DFSTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFSTX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

TISBX
TISBX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
TISBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TISBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
TISBX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
TISBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
TISBX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DFSTX vs. TISBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA U.S. Small Cap Portfolio (DFSTX) and TIAA-CREF Small-Cap Blend Index Fund (TISBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DFSTXTISBXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.29

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.85

3.09

-0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.79

10.95

-1.17

DFSTX vs. TISBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFSTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is comparable to the TISBX Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFSTX and TISBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DFSTX vs. TISBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFSTX drawdown since its inception was -60.99%, which is greater than TISBX's maximum drawdown of -56.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFSTX and TISBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFSTXTISBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.99%

-56.50%

-4.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.16%

-10.95%

+1.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.91%

-27.44%

+1.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.91%

-31.89%

+5.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.78%

-41.69%

-3.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.67%

-2.53%

+0.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.73%

-9.63%

+0.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.68%

3.09%

-0.41%

Volatility

DFSTX vs. TISBX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DFA U.S. Small Cap Portfolio (DFSTX) is 3.49%, while TIAA-CREF Small-Cap Blend Index Fund (TISBX) has a volatility of 3.81%. This indicates that DFSTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TISBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFSTXTISBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.49%

3.81%

-0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.59%

14.08%

-2.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.68%

19.42%

-2.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.43%

22.52%

-2.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.01%

23.41%

-1.40%

DFSTX vs. TISBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFSTX has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is higher than TISBX's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DFSTX vs. TISBX - Dividend Comparison

DFSTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, less than TISBX's 3.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFSTX
DFA U.S. Small Cap Portfolio
0.97%1.08%1.05%2.45%5.18%6.39%1.08%3.30%5.16%4.56%3.10%5.90%
TISBX
TIAA-CREF Small-Cap Blend Index Fund
3.45%4.12%6.82%3.09%1.97%8.96%2.65%5.16%9.29%4.49%4.03%4.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, DFSTX and TISBX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TISBX has higher volatility (3.81%) compared to DFSTX (3.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFSTX dropped -60.99% vs TISBX's -56.50%.

TISBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFSTX and TISBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer