PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFSPX vs. FISZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFSPX vs. FISZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA International Sustainability Core 1 Portfolio (DFSPX) and Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund (FISZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFSPX achieves a 7.29% return, which is significantly lower than FISZX's 31.45% return.


DFSPX

1D
0.58%
1M
1.41%
YTD
7.29%
6M
7.42%
1Y
22.15%
3Y*
16.37%
5Y*
8.34%
10Y*
9.61%

FISZX

1D
2.96%
1M
8.91%
YTD
31.45%
6M
33.58%
1Y
49.39%
3Y*
22.96%
5Y*
9.84%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFSPX vs. FISZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
DFSPX
DFA International Sustainability Core 1 Portfolio
7.29%32.97%4.99%18.37%-17.70%12.12%11.64%10.12%
FISZX
Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund
31.45%31.77%3.61%15.83%-28.32%9.91%23.49%13.42%

Correlation

The correlation between DFSPX and FISZX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2019

0.89

The correlation between DFSPX and FISZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFSPX vs. FISZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFSPX
DFSPX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
DFSPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFSPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFSPX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
DFSPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFSPX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

FISZX
FISZX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FISZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FISZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
FISZX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
FISZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
FISZX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFSPX vs. FISZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA International Sustainability Core 1 Portfolio (DFSPX) and Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund (FISZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DFSPXFISZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.43

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.80

3.38

-1.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.55

13.11

-6.56

DFSPX vs. FISZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFSPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is lower than the FISZX Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFSPX and FISZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DFSPX vs. FISZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFSPX drawdown since its inception was -35.86%, smaller than the maximum FISZX drawdown of -39.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFSPX and FISZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFSPXFISZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.86%

-39.92%

+4.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.96%

-14.48%

+2.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.72%

-14.63%

+1.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.68%

-39.92%

+7.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.37%

0.00%

-1.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.20%

-12.30%

+5.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.27%

3.72%

-0.45%

Volatility

DFSPX vs. FISZX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DFA International Sustainability Core 1 Portfolio (DFSPX) is 4.73%, while Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund (FISZX) has a volatility of 10.46%. This indicates that DFSPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FISZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFSPXFISZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.73%

10.46%

-5.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.64%

18.55%

-5.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.14%

20.87%

-5.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.18%

18.29%

-2.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.25%

18.53%

-2.28%

DFSPX vs. FISZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFSPX has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than FISZX's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DFSPX vs. FISZX - Dividend Comparison

DFSPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%, more than FISZX's 1.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFSPX
DFA International Sustainability Core 1 Portfolio
2.83%3.06%3.06%2.59%2.27%2.64%1.44%2.52%2.60%2.32%2.48%2.43%
FISZX
Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund
1.46%1.92%2.55%1.89%1.37%6.08%0.90%0.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFSPX and FISZX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FISZX has higher volatility (10.46%) compared to DFSPX (4.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFSPX dropped -35.86% vs FISZX's -39.92%.

FISZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFSPX and FISZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer