DFSMX vs. GUIRX
Compare and contrast key facts about DFA Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio (DFSMX) and Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund Investor Class (GUIRX).
DFSMX is managed by Dimensional. It was launched on Aug 19, 2002. GUIRX is an actively managed fund by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Jul 30, 2010.
Performance
DFSMX vs. GUIRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DFSMX vs. GUIRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFSMX DFA Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio | 0.55% | 2.30% | 2.84% | 2.98% | -0.36% | -0.11% | 0.83% | 1.62% | 1.22% | 1.15% |
GUIRX Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund Investor Class | -0.45% | 4.73% | 3.66% | 6.37% | -9.66% | 3.11% | 3.86% | 7.80% | 3.09% | 5.81% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFSMX achieves a 0.55% return, which is significantly higher than GUIRX's -0.45% return. Over the past 10 years, DFSMX has underperformed GUIRX with an annualized return of 1.23%, while GUIRX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.72% annualized return.
DFSMX
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -0.05%
- YTD
- 0.55%
- 6M
- 1.10%
- 1Y
- 2.45%
- 3Y*
- 2.60%
- 5Y*
- 1.63%
- 10Y*
- 1.23%
GUIRX
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- -2.33%
- YTD
- -0.45%
- 6M
- 0.89%
- 1Y
- 3.50%
- 3Y*
- 3.92%
- 5Y*
- 1.26%
- 10Y*
- 2.72%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DFSMX vs. GUIRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFSMX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than GUIRX's 0.47% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DFSMX vs. GUIRX — Risk / Return Rank
DFSMX
GUIRX
DFSMX vs. GUIRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio (DFSMX) and Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund Investor Class (GUIRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFSMX | GUIRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.68 | 0.97 | +2.71 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 6.50 | 1.33 | +5.17 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 3.20 | 1.28 | +1.92 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.59 | 0.95 | +3.64 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.83 | 3.46 | +18.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFSMX | GUIRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.68 | 0.97 | +2.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 2.11 | 0.35 | +1.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.60 | 0.69 | +0.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.78 | 1.07 | +0.71 |
Correlation
The correlation between DFSMX and GUIRX is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
DFSMX vs. GUIRX - Dividend Comparison
DFSMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.43%, less than GUIRX's 3.77% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFSMX DFA Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio | 2.43% | 2.08% | 2.80% | 1.94% | 0.63% | 0.19% | 0.83% | 1.22% | 1.11% | 0.95% | 0.94% | 0.95% |
GUIRX Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund Investor Class | 3.77% | 4.90% | 3.86% | 2.78% | 2.06% | 2.16% | 2.38% | 2.84% | 3.04% | 3.23% | 3.60% | 3.68% |
Drawdowns
DFSMX vs. GUIRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFSMX drawdown since its inception was -2.66%, smaller than the maximum GUIRX drawdown of -14.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFSMX and GUIRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFSMX | GUIRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.66% | -14.21% | +11.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.39% | -4.51% | +4.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -1.67% | -14.16% | +12.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -1.69% | -14.21% | +12.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.06% | -2.33% | +2.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.24% | -2.13% | +1.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.10% | 1.24% | -1.14% |
Volatility
DFSMX vs. GUIRX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for DFA Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio (DFSMX) is 0.11%, while Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund Investor Class (GUIRX) has a volatility of 0.89%. This indicates that DFSMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GUIRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DFSMX | GUIRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.11% | 0.89% | -0.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.37% | 1.52% | -1.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68% | 4.56% | -3.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.78% | 3.67% | -2.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.77% | 3.93% | -3.16% |