PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFP vs. GQHPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFP vs. GQHPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional Financial Leaders Fund (DFP) and GQG Partners US Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQHPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFP achieves a 0.81% return, which is significantly lower than GQHPX's 10.15% return.


DFP

1D
-0.78%
1M
-2.71%
YTD
0.81%
6M
0.06%
1Y
8.67%
3Y*
12.59%
5Y*
-0.04%
10Y*
5.87%

GQHPX

1D
0.49%
1M
-1.32%
YTD
10.15%
6M
10.63%
1Y
11.82%
3Y*
12.25%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFP vs. GQHPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
DFP
Dimensional Financial Leaders Fund
0.81%11.88%20.47%2.12%-26.32%-1.87%
GQHPX
GQG Partners US Quality Dividend Income Fund
10.15%7.53%12.69%3.94%6.73%10.34%

Correlation

The correlation between DFP and GQHPX is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2021

0.29

The correlation between DFP and GQHPX shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.29 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFP vs. GQHPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFP
DFP Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
DFP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFP Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFP Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
DFP Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFP Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

GQHPX
GQHPX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
GQHPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GQHPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
GQHPX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
GQHPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
GQHPX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFP vs. GQHPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Financial Leaders Fund (DFP) and GQG Partners US Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQHPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFPGQHPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.20

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.87

2.29

-1.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.07

5.73

-2.66

DFP vs. GQHPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFP Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is comparable to the GQHPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFP and GQHPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFPGQHPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

1.19

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.84

-0.48

Drawdowns

DFP vs. GQHPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFP drawdown since its inception was -47.32%, which is greater than GQHPX's maximum drawdown of -17.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFP and GQHPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFPGQHPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.32%

-17.26%

-30.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.97%

-5.08%

-4.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.27%

-8.71%

-5.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.30%

-3.59%

-1.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.75%

-3.35%

-6.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.83%

2.03%

+0.80%

Volatility

DFP vs. GQHPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dimensional Financial Leaders Fund (DFP) is 2.72%, while GQG Partners US Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQHPX) has a volatility of 3.49%. This indicates that DFP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GQHPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFPGQHPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.72%

3.49%

-0.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.86%

7.72%

-0.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.70%

9.77%

-1.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.54%

12.66%

+1.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.97%

12.66%

+6.31%

DFP vs. GQHPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFP has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than GQHPX's 0.57% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFP vs. GQHPX - Dividend Comparison

DFP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.45%, more than GQHPX's 3.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFP
Dimensional Financial Leaders Fund
7.45%6.99%6.81%7.39%10.54%7.03%6.36%6.41%8.75%7.11%8.16%8.38%
GQHPX
GQG Partners US Quality Dividend Income Fund
3.62%2.98%3.14%2.64%3.24%0.77%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFP and GQHPX have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GQHPX has higher volatility (3.49%) compared to DFP (2.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFP dropped -47.32% vs GQHPX's -17.26%.

GQHPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFP and GQHPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer