DFNS.L vs. SHLD
DFNS.L (VanEck Defense UCITS ETF) and SHLD (Global X Defense Tech ETF) are both Aerospace & Defense funds - DFNS.L tracks the MarketVector™ Global Defense Industry Index while SHLD tracks the Global X Defense Tech Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, DFNS.L returned 15.78% vs 9.71% for SHLD. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DFNS.L charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SHLD.
Performance
DFNS.L vs. SHLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFNS.L achieves a 2.88% return, which is significantly higher than SHLD's -2.28% return.
DFNS.L
- 1D
- -1.80%
- 1M
- -5.10%
- YTD
- 2.88%
- 6M
- 8.71%
- 1Y
- 15.78%
- 3Y*
- 42.95%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SHLD
- 1D
- -2.39%
- 1M
- -7.01%
- YTD
- -2.28%
- 6M
- 1.71%
- 1Y
- 9.71%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DFNS.L vs. SHLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DFNS.L VanEck Defense UCITS ETF | 2.88% | 68.21% | 43.74% | 8.06% |
SHLD Global X Defense Tech ETF | -2.28% | 74.16% | 35.03% | 12.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFNS.L and SHLD is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2023 | 0.75 |
The correlation between DFNS.L and SHLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFNS.L vs. SHLD — Risk / Return Rank
DFNS.L
SHLD
DFNS.L vs. SHLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Defense UCITS ETF (DFNS.L) and Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFNS.L | SHLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.08 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.84 | 0.49 | +0.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.09 | 1.30 | +0.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFNS.L | SHLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 | 0.41 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.01 | 2.00 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
DFNS.L vs. SHLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFNS.L drawdown since its inception was -18.72%, smaller than the maximum SHLD drawdown of -20.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFNS.L and SHLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFNS.L | SHLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.72% | -20.10% | +1.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.72% | -20.10% | +1.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.72% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.86% | -18.85% | +2.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.39% | -3.19% | -0.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.50% | 7.51% | -0.01% |
Volatility
DFNS.L vs. SHLD - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Defense UCITS ETF (DFNS.L) and Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD) have volatilities of 8.07% and 7.81%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFNS.L | SHLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.07% | 7.81% | +0.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.53% | 19.35% | +0.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.88% | 24.05% | +0.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.56% | 21.13% | +0.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.56% | 21.13% | +0.43% |
DFNS.L vs. SHLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFNS.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than SHLD's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFNS.L vs. SHLD - Dividend Comparison
DFNS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SHLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DFNS.L VanEck Defense UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SHLD Global X Defense Tech ETF | 0.56% | 0.55% | 0.53% | 0.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFNS.L and SHLD have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SHLD is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SHLD is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for DFNS.L.
DFNS.L tracks MarketVector™ Global Defense Industry Index, while SHLD tracks Global X Defense Tech Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for DFNS.L and 0.50% for SHLD.
Find the right allocation for DFNS.L and SHLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer