PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFNS.L vs. LSMC.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFNS.L vs. LSMC.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Defense UCITS ETF (DFNS.L) and Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

DFNS.L is traded in USD, while LSMC.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the LSMC.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFNS.L achieves a 2.88% return, which is significantly lower than LSMC.DE's 67.44% return.


DFNS.L

1D
-1.80%
1M
-5.10%
YTD
2.88%
6M
8.71%
1Y
15.78%
3Y*
42.95%
5Y*
10Y*

LSMC.DE

1D
0.08%
1M
24.28%
YTD
67.44%
6M
70.27%
1Y
142.61%
3Y*
67.73%
5Y*
35.84%
10Y*
29.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFNS.L vs. LSMC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
DFNS.L
VanEck Defense UCITS ETF
2.88%68.21%43.74%25.73%
LSMC.DE
Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF
67.44%49.69%57.01%41.32%

Correlation

The correlation between DFNS.L and LSMC.DE is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2023

0.39

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFNS.L vs. LSMC.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFNS.L
DFNS.L Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
DFNS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFNS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFNS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
DFNS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFNS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

LSMC.DE
LSMC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
LSMC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSMC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSMC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
LSMC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSMC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFNS.L vs. LSMC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Defense UCITS ETF (DFNS.L) and Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFNS.LLSMC.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.63

-0.51

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.84

9.69

-8.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.09

34.54

-32.44

DFNS.L vs. LSMC.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFNS.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.63, which is lower than the LSMC.DE Sharpe Ratio of 4.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFNS.L and LSMC.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFNS.LLSMC.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

4.66

-4.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.01

0.75

+1.26

Drawdowns

DFNS.L vs. LSMC.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFNS.L drawdown since its inception was -18.72%, smaller than the maximum LSMC.DE drawdown of -47.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFNS.L and LSMC.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFNS.LLSMC.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.72%

-47.64%

+28.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.72%

-14.63%

-4.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.72%

-32.83%

+14.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.86%

0.00%

-15.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.39%

-10.23%

+6.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.50%

4.11%

+3.39%

Volatility

DFNS.L vs. LSMC.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Defense UCITS ETF (DFNS.L) is 8.07%, while Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE) has a volatility of 11.18%. This indicates that DFNS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSMC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFNS.LLSMC.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.07%

11.18%

-3.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.53%

22.58%

-3.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.88%

30.54%

-5.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.56%

32.36%

-10.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.56%

26.91%

-5.35%

DFNS.L vs. LSMC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFNS.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than LSMC.DE's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFNS.L vs. LSMC.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither DFNS.L nor LSMC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


DFNS.L and LSMC.DE have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LSMC.DE is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LSMC.DE is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for DFNS.L.

DFNS.L is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while LSMC.DE is Semiconductors. DFNS.L tracks MarketVector™ Global Defense Industry Index, while LSMC.DE tracks MSCI ACWI Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment ESG Filtered NET USD Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for DFNS.L and 0.45% for LSMC.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFNS.L and LSMC.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer