PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFNS.L vs. IUSQ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFNS.L vs. IUSQ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Defense UCITS ETF (DFNS.L) and iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IUSQ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

DFNS.L is traded in USD, while IUSQ.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the IUSQ.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFNS.L achieves a 0.90% return, which is significantly lower than IUSQ.DE's 10.01% return.


DFNS.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.02%
YTD
0.90%
6M
2.54%
1Y
12.91%
3Y*
40.45%
5Y*
10Y*

IUSQ.DE

1D
1.75%
1M
0.92%
YTD
10.01%
6M
11.76%
1Y
25.71%
3Y*
19.85%
5Y*
11.00%
10Y*
12.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFNS.L vs. IUSQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
DFNS.L
VanEck Defense UCITS ETF
0.90%68.21%43.74%25.97%
IUSQ.DE
iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc)
10.01%23.07%17.40%15.16%

Correlation

The correlation between DFNS.L and IUSQ.DE is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2023

0.53

The correlation between DFNS.L and IUSQ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.43 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFNS.L vs. IUSQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFNS.L
DFNS.L Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
DFNS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFNS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFNS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
DFNS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFNS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

IUSQ.DE
IUSQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
IUSQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUSQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUSQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
IUSQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUSQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFNS.L vs. IUSQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Defense UCITS ETF (DFNS.L) and iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IUSQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DFNS.LIUSQ.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.36

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.66

2.89

-2.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.61

12.04

-10.43

DFNS.L vs. IUSQ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFNS.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.52, which is lower than the IUSQ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFNS.L and IUSQ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DFNS.L vs. IUSQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFNS.L drawdown since its inception was -19.66%, smaller than the maximum IUSQ.DE drawdown of -34.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFNS.L and IUSQ.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFNS.LIUSQ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.66%

-34.07%

+14.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.66%

-8.85%

-10.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.66%

-17.48%

-2.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.48%

-1.91%

-15.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.49%

-5.02%

+1.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.00%

2.13%

+5.87%

Volatility

DFNS.L vs. IUSQ.DE - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Defense UCITS ETF (DFNS.L) has a higher volatility of 8.29% compared to iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IUSQ.DE) at 3.93%. This indicates that DFNS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IUSQ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFNS.LIUSQ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.29%

3.93%

+4.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.56%

9.72%

+9.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.07%

12.49%

+12.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.58%

15.50%

+6.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.58%

15.92%

+5.66%

DFNS.L vs. IUSQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFNS.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than IUSQ.DE's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFNS.L vs. IUSQ.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither DFNS.L nor IUSQ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


DFNS.L and IUSQ.DE have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IUSQ.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IUSQ.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for DFNS.L.

DFNS.L is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while IUSQ.DE is Global Equities. DFNS.L tracks MarketVector™ Global Defense Industry Index, while IUSQ.DE tracks MSCI All Country World (ACWI). They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for DFNS.L and 0.20% for IUSQ.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFNS.L and IUSQ.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer