DFNS.L vs. 8PSE.DE
DFNS.L (VanEck Defense UCITS ETF) and 8PSE.DE (Invesco Physical Gold (EUR Hedged) ETC) are both exchange-traded funds - DFNS.L is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the MarketVector™ Global Defense Industry Index, while 8PSE.DE is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM (EUR Hedged). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DFNS.L returned 40.45%/yr vs 31.57%/yr for 8PSE.DE. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DFNS.L charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for 8PSE.DE.
Performance
DFNS.L vs. 8PSE.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
DFNS.L is traded in USD, while 8PSE.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the 8PSE.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFNS.L achieves a 0.90% return, which is significantly higher than 8PSE.DE's -1.02% return.
DFNS.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.09%
- YTD
- 0.90%
- 6M
- 2.54%
- 1Y
- 10.82%
- 3Y*
- 40.45%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
8PSE.DE
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- -5.21%
- YTD
- -1.02%
- 6M
- 1.82%
- 1Y
- 27.37%
- 3Y*
- 31.57%
- 5Y*
- 14.39%
- 10Y*
- —
DFNS.L vs. 8PSE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DFNS.L VanEck Defense UCITS ETF | 0.90% | 68.21% | 43.74% | 25.97% |
8PSE.DE Invesco Physical Gold (EUR Hedged) ETC | -1.02% | 83.76% | 17.01% | 3.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFNS.L and 8PSE.DE is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2023 | 0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFNS.L vs. 8PSE.DE — Risk / Return Rank
DFNS.L
8PSE.DE
DFNS.L vs. 8PSE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Defense UCITS ETF (DFNS.L) and Invesco Physical Gold (EUR Hedged) ETC (8PSE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DFNS.L | 8PSE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.57 | -0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.66 | 0.59 | +0.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.61 | 2.35 | -0.74 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DFNS.L vs. 8PSE.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFNS.L drawdown since its inception was -19.66%, smaller than the maximum 8PSE.DE drawdown of -51.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFNS.L and 8PSE.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFNS.L | 8PSE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.66% | -51.35% | +31.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.66% | -51.35% | +31.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.66% | -51.35% | +31.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -51.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.48% | -18.71% | +1.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.49% | -13.96% | +10.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.00% | 12.99% | -4.99% |
Volatility
DFNS.L vs. 8PSE.DE - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Defense UCITS ETF (DFNS.L) has a higher volatility of 8.29% compared to Invesco Physical Gold (EUR Hedged) ETC (8PSE.DE) at 6.62%. This indicates that DFNS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 8PSE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFNS.L | 8PSE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.29% | 6.62% | +1.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.56% | 71.84% | -52.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.07% | 182.13% | -157.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.58% | 88.55% | -66.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.58% | 81.99% | -60.41% |
DFNS.L vs. 8PSE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFNS.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than 8PSE.DE's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFNS.L vs. 8PSE.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither DFNS.L nor 8PSE.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
DFNS.L and 8PSE.DE have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, 8PSE.DE is cheaper at 0.34% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
8PSE.DE is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for DFNS.L.
DFNS.L is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while 8PSE.DE is Gold. DFNS.L tracks MarketVector™ Global Defense Industry Index, while 8PSE.DE tracks LBMA Gold Price PM (EUR Hedged). They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for DFNS.L and 0.34% for 8PSE.DE.
Find the right allocation for DFNS.L and 8PSE.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer