DFNG.L vs. SSAC.L
DFNG.L (VanEck Defense ETF A USD Acc GBP) and SSAC.L (iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - DFNG.L is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the MarketVector Global Defense Industry index, while SSAC.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DFNG.L returned 39.39%/yr vs 18.28%/yr for SSAC.L. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DFNG.L charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for SSAC.L.
Performance
DFNG.L vs. SSAC.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
DFNG.L is traded in GBP, while SSAC.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SSAC.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFNG.L achieves a 3.11% return, which is significantly lower than SSAC.L's 11.92% return.
DFNG.L
- 1D
- -1.51%
- 1M
- -3.80%
- YTD
- 3.11%
- 6M
- 7.91%
- 1Y
- 16.52%
- 3Y*
- 39.39%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SSAC.L
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- 5.84%
- YTD
- 11.92%
- 6M
- 12.52%
- 1Y
- 30.38%
- 3Y*
- 18.28%
- 5Y*
- 12.59%
- 10Y*
- 13.64%
DFNG.L vs. SSAC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DFNG.L VanEck Defense ETF A USD Acc GBP | 3.11% | 56.54% | 46.20% | 22.89% |
SSAC.L iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) | 11.92% | 13.95% | 19.63% | 12.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFNG.L and SSAC.L is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2023 | 0.52 |
The correlation between DFNG.L and SSAC.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (1 year) to 0.52 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFNG.L vs. SSAC.L — Risk / Return Rank
DFNG.L
SSAC.L
DFNG.L vs. SSAC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Defense ETF A USD Acc GBP (DFNG.L) and iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (SSAC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFNG.L | SSAC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.55 | -0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.90 | 4.31 | -3.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.23 | 17.42 | -15.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFNG.L | SSAC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 | 2.89 | -2.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.97 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.95 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.97 | 0.89 | +1.07 |
Drawdowns
DFNG.L vs. SSAC.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFNG.L drawdown since its inception was -18.38%, smaller than the maximum SSAC.L drawdown of -25.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFNG.L and SSAC.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFNG.L | SSAC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.38% | -25.43% | +7.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.38% | -7.01% | -11.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.38% | -17.99% | -0.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.99% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -25.43% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.77% | -0.34% | -15.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.11% | -3.50% | +0.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.40% | 1.74% | +5.66% |
Volatility
DFNG.L vs. SSAC.L - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Defense ETF A USD Acc GBP (DFNG.L) has a higher volatility of 7.86% compared to iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (SSAC.L) at 2.89%. This indicates that DFNG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SSAC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFNG.L | SSAC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.86% | 2.89% | +4.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.80% | 7.73% | +11.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.20% | 10.51% | +13.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.40% | 12.98% | +7.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.40% | 14.38% | +6.02% |
DFNG.L vs. SSAC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFNG.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than SSAC.L's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFNG.L vs. SSAC.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither DFNG.L nor SSAC.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
DFNG.L and SSAC.L have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SSAC.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SSAC.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for DFNG.L.
DFNG.L is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while SSAC.L is Global Equities. DFNG.L tracks MarketVector Global Defense Industry index, while SSAC.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for DFNG.L and 0.20% for SSAC.L.
Find the right allocation for DFNG.L and SSAC.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer