PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFNG.L vs. DFND.AS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFNG.L vs. DFND.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in VanEck Defense ETF A USD Acc GBP (DFNG.L) and iShares Global Aerospace & Defence UCITS ETF (DFND.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

DFNG.L is traded in GBP, while DFND.AS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the DFND.AS values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period


DFNG.L

1D
-1.51%
1M
-3.80%
YTD
3.11%
6M
7.91%
1Y
16.52%
3Y*
39.39%
5Y*
10Y*

DFND.AS

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFNG.L vs. DFND.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
DFNG.L
VanEck Defense ETF A USD Acc GBP
3.11%56.54%28.43%
DFND.AS
iShares Global Aerospace & Defence UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%16.10%

Correlation

The correlation between DFNG.L and DFND.AS is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2024

0.30

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFNG.L vs. DFND.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFNG.L
DFNG.L Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
DFNG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFNG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFNG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
DFNG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFNG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

DFND.AS
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFNG.L vs. DFND.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Defense ETF A USD Acc GBP (DFNG.L) and iShares Global Aerospace & Defence UCITS ETF (DFND.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFNG.LDFND.ASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.23

DFNG.L vs. DFND.AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFNG.LDFND.ASDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.97

Drawdowns

DFNG.L vs. DFND.AS - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFNG.LDFND.ASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.40%

Volatility

DFNG.L vs. DFND.AS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFNG.LDFND.ASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.40%

DFNG.L vs. DFND.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFNG.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than DFND.AS's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFNG.L vs. DFND.AS - Dividend Comparison

Neither DFNG.L nor DFND.AS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


DFNG.L and DFND.AS have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DFND.AS is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DFND.AS is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for DFNG.L.

DFNG.L is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while DFND.AS is Industrials Equities. DFNG.L tracks MarketVector Global Defense Industry index, while DFND.AS tracks S&P Developed BMI Select Aerospace & Defense 35/20 Capped Index NR. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for DFNG.L and 0.35% for DFND.AS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFNG.L and DFND.AS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer