PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFNG.L vs. ARMR.AX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFNG.L vs. ARMR.AX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in VanEck Defense ETF A USD Acc GBP (DFNG.L) and Betashares Global Defence ETF (ARMR.AX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

DFNG.L is traded in GBP, while ARMR.AX is traded in AUD. To make them comparable, the ARMR.AX values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFNG.L achieves a 3.11% return, which is significantly lower than ARMR.AX's 3.90% return.


DFNG.L

1D
-1.51%
1M
-3.80%
YTD
3.11%
6M
7.91%
1Y
16.52%
3Y*
39.39%
5Y*
10Y*

ARMR.AX

1D
-1.29%
1M
1.16%
YTD
3.90%
6M
9.96%
1Y
17.98%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFNG.L vs. ARMR.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
DFNG.L
VanEck Defense ETF A USD Acc GBP
3.11%56.54%7.39%
ARMR.AX
Betashares Global Defence ETF
3.90%47.93%7.15%

Correlation

The correlation between DFNG.L and ARMR.AX is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2024

0.35

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFNG.L vs. ARMR.AX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFNG.L
DFNG.L Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
DFNG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFNG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFNG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
DFNG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFNG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

ARMR.AX
ARMR.AX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
ARMR.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARMR.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARMR.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
ARMR.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARMR.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFNG.L vs. ARMR.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Defense ETF A USD Acc GBP (DFNG.L) and Betashares Global Defence ETF (ARMR.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFNG.LARMR.AXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.14

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.90

1.02

-0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.23

2.65

-0.42

DFNG.L vs. ARMR.AX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFNG.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is comparable to the ARMR.AX Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFNG.L and ARMR.AX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFNG.LARMR.AXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

0.74

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.97

1.47

+0.50

Drawdowns

DFNG.L vs. ARMR.AX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFNG.L drawdown since its inception was -18.38%, which is greater than ARMR.AX's maximum drawdown of -17.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFNG.L and ARMR.AX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFNG.LARMR.AXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.38%

-17.44%

-0.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.38%

-17.44%

-0.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.77%

-13.04%

-2.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.11%

-3.94%

+0.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.40%

6.76%

+0.64%

Volatility

DFNG.L vs. ARMR.AX - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Defense ETF A USD Acc GBP (DFNG.L) has a higher volatility of 7.86% compared to Betashares Global Defence ETF (ARMR.AX) at 7.01%. This indicates that DFNG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARMR.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFNG.LARMR.AXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.86%

7.01%

+0.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.80%

19.62%

-0.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.20%

24.05%

+0.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.40%

23.91%

-3.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.40%

23.91%

-3.51%

DFNG.L vs. ARMR.AX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DFNG.L and ARMR.AX have an expense ratio of 0.55%.


Dividends

DFNG.L vs. ARMR.AX - Dividend Comparison

DFNG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ARMR.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.38%.


PositionTTM2025
ARMR.AX
Betashares Global Defence ETF
2.38%2.18%
DFNG.L
VanEck Defense ETF A USD Acc GBP
0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFNG.L and ARMR.AX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.55% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DFNG.L and ARMR.AX have the same expense ratio: 0.55% per year.

DFNG.L tracks MarketVector Global Defense Industry index, while ARMR.AX tracks VettaFi Global Defence Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and BetaShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFNG.L and ARMR.AX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer