PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ARMR.AX vs. DFNS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ARMR.AX vs. DFNS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in Betashares Global Defence ETF (ARMR.AX) and VanEck Defense UCITS ETF (DFNS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ARMR.AX vs. DFNS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
ARMR.AX
Betashares Global Defence ETF
0.05%47.73%12.11%
DFNS.L
VanEck Defense UCITS ETF
2.79%56.00%12.65%
Different Trading Currencies

ARMR.AX is traded in AUD, while DFNS.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the DFNS.L values have been converted to AUD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARMR.AX achieves a 0.05% return, which is significantly lower than DFNS.L's 2.79% return.


ARMR.AX

1D
-2.46%
1M
-6.54%
YTD
0.05%
6M
-4.34%
1Y
28.11%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DFNS.L

1D
-0.75%
1M
-4.30%
YTD
2.79%
6M
-4.12%
1Y
33.98%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ARMR.AX vs. DFNS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ARMR.AX and DFNS.L have an expense ratio of 0.55%.


Return for Risk

ARMR.AX vs. DFNS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARMR.AX
ARMR.AX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
ARMR.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARMR.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARMR.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
ARMR.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARMR.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

DFNS.L
DFNS.L Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
DFNS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFNS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFNS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
DFNS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFNS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARMR.AX vs. DFNS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Betashares Global Defence ETF (ARMR.AX) and VanEck Defense UCITS ETF (DFNS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ARMR.AXDFNS.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.17

1.37

-0.20

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.68

1.99

-0.31

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.24

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.84

2.03

-0.18

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.89

5.02

-0.13

ARMR.AX vs. DFNS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARMR.AX Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is comparable to the DFNS.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARMR.AX and DFNS.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ARMR.AXDFNS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.17

1.37

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.78

2.26

-0.48

Correlation

The correlation between ARMR.AX and DFNS.L is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

ARMR.AX vs. DFNS.L - Dividend Comparison

ARMR.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%, while DFNS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2025
ARMR.AX
Betashares Global Defence ETF
2.31%2.18%
DFNS.L
VanEck Defense UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

ARMR.AX vs. DFNS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARMR.AX drawdown since its inception was -14.86%, smaller than the maximum DFNS.L drawdown of -15.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARMR.AX and DFNS.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ARMR.AXDFNS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.86%

-14.92%

+0.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.86%

-14.92%

+0.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.86%

-12.94%

-1.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.25%

-2.91%

-0.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.61%

5.50%

+0.11%

Volatility

ARMR.AX vs. DFNS.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Betashares Global Defence ETF (ARMR.AX) is 7.24%, while VanEck Defense UCITS ETF (DFNS.L) has a volatility of 7.84%. This indicates that ARMR.AX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFNS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ARMR.AXDFNS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.24%

7.84%

-0.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.10%

17.83%

+0.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.05%

24.68%

-0.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.77%

20.58%

+2.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.77%

20.58%

+2.19%