DFND.AS vs. DFNG.L
DFND.AS (iShares Global Aerospace & Defence UCITS ETF) and DFNG.L (VanEck Defense ETF A USD Acc GBP) are both exchange-traded funds - DFND.AS is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the S&P Developed BMI Select Aerospace & Defense 35/20 Capped Index NR, while DFNG.L is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the MarketVector Global Defense Industry index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DFND.AS charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for DFNG.L.
Performance
DFND.AS vs. DFNG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
DFND.AS is traded in USD, while DFNG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the DFNG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
DFND.AS
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DFNG.L
- 1D
- -1.77%
- 1M
- -4.81%
- YTD
- 2.86%
- 6M
- 8.49%
- 1Y
- 15.75%
- 3Y*
- 42.95%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DFND.AS vs. DFNG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
DFND.AS iShares Global Aerospace & Defence UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 16.29% |
DFNG.L VanEck Defense ETF A USD Acc GBP | 2.86% | 68.35% | 27.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFND.AS and DFNG.L is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2024 | 0.31 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFND.AS vs. DFNG.L — Risk / Return Rank
DFND.AS
DFNG.L
DFND.AS vs. DFNG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Aerospace & Defence UCITS ETF (DFND.AS) and VanEck Defense ETF A USD Acc GBP (DFNG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFND.AS | DFNG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.63 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 2.04 | — |
Drawdowns
DFND.AS vs. DFNG.L - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFND.AS | DFNG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -18.77% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -18.77% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.77% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -15.77% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -3.36% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 7.42% | — |
Volatility
DFND.AS vs. DFNG.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFND.AS | DFNG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.95% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 19.65% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 24.84% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 21.31% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 21.31% | — |
DFND.AS vs. DFNG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFND.AS has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than DFNG.L's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFND.AS vs. DFNG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither DFND.AS nor DFNG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
DFND.AS and DFNG.L have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DFND.AS is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DFND.AS is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for DFNG.L.
DFND.AS is categorized as Industrials Equities, while DFNG.L is Aerospace & Defense. DFND.AS tracks S&P Developed BMI Select Aerospace & Defense 35/20 Capped Index NR, while DFNG.L tracks MarketVector Global Defense Industry index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for DFND.AS and 0.55% for DFNG.L.
Find the right allocation for DFND.AS and DFNG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer