PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFLVX vs. DFUSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFLVX vs. DFUSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA U.S. Large Cap Value Portfolio (DFLVX) and DFA U.S. Large Company Portfolio (DFUSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFLVX achieves a 16.01% return, which is significantly higher than DFUSX's 11.70% return. Over the past 10 years, DFLVX has underperformed DFUSX with an annualized return of 11.94%, while DFUSX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.52% annualized return.


DFLVX

1D
1.10%
1M
5.70%
YTD
16.01%
6M
17.69%
1Y
33.76%
3Y*
19.38%
5Y*
11.03%
10Y*
11.94%

DFUSX

1D
0.14%
1M
5.79%
YTD
11.70%
6M
11.72%
1Y
28.90%
3Y*
22.69%
5Y*
14.21%
10Y*
15.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFLVX vs. DFUSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DFLVX
DFA U.S. Large Cap Value Portfolio
16.01%16.36%12.76%11.52%-5.81%30.40%-0.58%25.46%-11.68%18.50%
DFUSX
DFA U.S. Large Company Portfolio
11.70%17.76%24.91%26.28%-18.14%28.53%18.41%32.08%-4.45%21.04%

Correlation

The correlation between DFLVX and DFUSX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 1999

0.89

The correlation between DFLVX and DFUSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.89 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFLVX vs. DFUSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFLVX
DFLVX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
DFLVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFLVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFLVX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
DFLVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFLVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

DFUSX
DFUSX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
DFUSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFUSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFUSX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
DFUSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFUSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFLVX vs. DFUSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA U.S. Large Cap Value Portfolio (DFLVX) and DFA U.S. Large Company Portfolio (DFUSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFLVXDFUSXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.20

2.60

+0.60

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.51

3.60

+0.91

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

1.47

+0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

6.02

3.39

+2.63

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

22.08

15.85

+6.23

DFLVX vs. DFUSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFLVX Sharpe Ratio is 3.20, which is comparable to the DFUSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFLVX and DFUSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFLVXDFUSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.20

2.60

+0.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.85

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

0.86

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.46

+0.07

Drawdowns

DFLVX vs. DFUSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFLVX drawdown since its inception was -65.65%, which is greater than DFUSX's maximum drawdown of -54.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFLVX and DFUSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFLVXDFUSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.65%

-54.96%

-10.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.86%

-8.88%

+3.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.64%

-18.76%

+2.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.83%

-24.58%

+4.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.79%

-33.79%

-8.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.48%

-10.60%

+2.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.59%

1.88%

-0.29%

Volatility

DFLVX vs. DFUSX - Volatility Comparison

DFA U.S. Large Cap Value Portfolio (DFLVX) and DFA U.S. Large Company Portfolio (DFUSX) have volatilities of 2.86% and 2.81%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFLVXDFUSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.86%

2.81%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.21%

8.99%

-0.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.02%

11.55%

-0.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.88%

16.87%

-0.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.38%

18.07%

+0.31%

DFLVX vs. DFUSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFLVX has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than DFUSX's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DFLVX vs. DFUSX - Dividend Comparison

DFLVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, more than DFUSX's 0.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFLVX
DFA U.S. Large Cap Value Portfolio
1.45%1.71%1.87%3.65%4.56%5.90%1.97%4.04%7.83%6.06%3.77%6.52%
DFUSX
DFA U.S. Large Company Portfolio
0.95%1.04%1.24%4.17%6.24%6.57%3.82%2.74%2.64%1.56%1.95%2.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFLVX and DFUSX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DFLVX has higher volatility (2.86%) compared to DFUSX (2.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFLVX dropped -65.65% vs DFUSX's -54.96%.

DFLVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.20 vs 2.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFLVX and DFUSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer