DFJ vs. GDMN

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

DFJ (WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Fund) and GDMN (WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - DFJ is a Japan Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Index, while GDMN is a Commodities fund actively managed by WisdomTree. DFJ is passively managed, while GDMN is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, DFJ returned 19.83%/yr vs 56.12%/yr for GDMN. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DFJ charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for GDMN.

Performance

DFJ vs. GDMN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Fund (DFJ) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFJ achieves a 10.30% return, which is significantly higher than GDMN's -17.89% return.

DFJ

• 1D: -2.08%
• 1M: -0.13%
• YTD: 10.30%
• 6M: 10.45%
• 1Y: 29.48%
• 3Y*: 19.83%
• 5Y*: 10.02%
• 10Y*: 9.32%

GDMN

• 1D: -5.34%
• 1M: -15.68%
• YTD: -17.89%
• 6M: -24.58%
• 1Y: 50.67%
• 3Y*: 56.12%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFJ vs. GDMN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
DFJ WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Fund	10.30%	31.90%	2.80%	21.81%	-9.00%	-1.20%
GDMN WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund	-17.89%	237.09%	28.23%	12.97%	-14.62%	6.93%

Correlation

The correlation between DFJ and GDMN is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.33
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.35
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2021	0.35

DFJ vs. GDMN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DFJ	GDMN
Industrials	27.1%	-
Consumer Cyclical	15.0%	-
Basic Materials	13.6%	100.0%
Financial Services	13.1%	-
Technology	13.0%	-
Consumer Defensive	6.3%	-
Healthcare	3.7%	-
Real Estate	2.7%	-
Utilities	1.5%	-
Communication Services	1.4%	-
Energy	0.6%	-

Return for Risk

DFJ vs. GDMN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFJ

DFJ Risk / Return Rank: 50
DFJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
DFJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
DFJ Omega Ratio Rank: 51
DFJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
DFJ Martin Ratio Rank: 41

GDMN

GDMN Risk / Return Rank: 24
GDMN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
GDMN Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
GDMN Omega Ratio Rank: 28
GDMN Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
GDMN Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFJ vs. GDMN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Fund (DFJ) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DFJ	GDMN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.76	0.79	+0.96
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.46	1.29	+1.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.18	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.27	1.04	+1.23
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.34	2.68	+3.66

DFJ vs. GDMN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFJ Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is higher than the GDMN Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFJ and GDMN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DFJ vs. GDMN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFJ drawdown since its inception was -46.00%, smaller than the maximum GDMN drawdown of -52.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFJ and GDMN.

Drawdown Indicators

	DFJ	GDMN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-46.00%	-52.82%	+6.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.03%	-48.76%	+35.73%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.03%	-48.76%	+35.73%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.71%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.02%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.86%	-46.10%	+40.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.14%	-19.14%	+8.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.66%	19.00%	-14.34%

Volatility

DFJ vs. GDMN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Fund (DFJ) is 5.39%, while WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN) has a volatility of 22.22%. This indicates that DFJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDMN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DFJ	GDMN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.39%	22.22%	-16.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.93%	55.20%	-41.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.85%	64.10%	-47.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.96%	48.22%	-32.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.94%	48.22%	-31.28%

DFJ vs. GDMN - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFJ has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than GDMN's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

DFJ vs. GDMN - Dividend Comparison

DFJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.41%, less than GDMN's 3.29% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DFJ WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Fund	2.41%	2.68%	2.46%	2.43%	2.62%	2.07%	2.59%	2.24%	1.89%	1.60%	1.76%	1.23%
GDMN WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund	3.29%	2.70%	9.44%	7.69%	1.44%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DFJ and GDMN in my portfolio?

DFJ and GDMN have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DFJ or GDMN?

GDMN has higher volatility (22.22%) compared to DFJ (5.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFJ dropped -46.00% vs GDMN's -52.82%.

Which ETF is better, DFJ or GDMN?

On 3-year performance, GDMN leads with 56.12% vs 19.83% for DFJ. On fees, GDMN is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, DFJ has been the lower-risk option at 5.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DFJ or GDMN?

Over the 3-year period, GDMN has performed better with a 56.12% return vs 19.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DFJ or GDMN?

GDMN is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for DFJ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DFJ or GDMN?

GDMN has the higher dividend yield at 3.29%, compared with 2.41% for DFJ.

What is the main difference between DFJ and GDMN?

DFJ is categorized as Japan Equities, while GDMN is Commodities. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for DFJ and 0.45% for GDMN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DFJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.