DFIVX vs. IOO
DFIVX (DFA International Value Portfolio) and IOO (iShares Global 100 ETF) are both funds - DFIVX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by Dimensional, while IOO is a Global Equities fund tracking the S&P Global 100 Index (Net). Over the past 10 years, DFIVX returned 12.11%/yr vs 16.66%/yr for IOO. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DFIVX charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for IOO.
Performance
DFIVX vs. IOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFIVX achieves a 11.58% return, which is significantly higher than IOO's 9.16% return. Over the past 10 years, DFIVX has underperformed IOO with an annualized return of 12.11%, while IOO has yielded a comparatively higher 16.66% annualized return.
DFIVX
- 1D
- 2.28%
- 1M
- 0.82%
- YTD
- 11.58%
- 6M
- 13.38%
- 1Y
- 34.22%
- 3Y*
- 23.51%
- 5Y*
- 14.00%
- 10Y*
- 12.11%
IOO
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -1.76%
- YTD
- 9.16%
- 6M
- 10.36%
- 1Y
- 33.70%
- 3Y*
- 23.85%
- 5Y*
- 15.85%
- 10Y*
- 16.66%
DFIVX vs. IOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFIVX DFA International Value Portfolio | 11.58% | 45.24% | 6.87% | 17.83% | -3.51% | 18.57% | -2.13% | 15.68% | -17.49% | 26.08% |
IOO iShares Global 100 ETF | 9.16% | 27.02% | 26.54% | 27.71% | -16.34% | 26.03% | 18.61% | 30.01% | -6.22% | 23.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFIVX and IOO is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2000 | 0.80 |
The correlation between DFIVX and IOO shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (3 years) to 0.80 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFIVX vs. IOO — Risk / Return Rank
DFIVX
IOO
DFIVX vs. IOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA International Value Portfolio (DFIVX) and iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DFIVX | IOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.41 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.60 | 3.23 | +0.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.00 | 14.35 | -0.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DFIVX vs. IOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFIVX drawdown since its inception was -66.61%, which is greater than IOO's maximum drawdown of -55.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFIVX and IOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFIVX | IOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.61% | -55.85% | -10.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.58% | -9.94% | +0.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.39% | -19.19% | +4.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.29% | -23.52% | -1.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.11% | -31.43% | -16.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.55% | -4.05% | +2.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.23% | -11.26% | -0.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.46% | 2.24% | +0.22% |
Volatility
DFIVX vs. IOO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for DFA International Value Portfolio (DFIVX) is 4.48%, while iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO) has a volatility of 4.82%. This indicates that DFIVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFIVX | IOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.48% | 4.82% | -0.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.46% | 11.31% | +0.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.26% | 14.07% | +0.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.36% | 17.12% | -0.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.01% | 17.80% | +0.21% |
DFIVX vs. IOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFIVX has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than IOO's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFIVX vs. IOO - Dividend Comparison
DFIVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.77%, more than IOO's 0.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFIVX DFA International Value Portfolio | 3.77% | 4.21% | 3.94% | 4.40% | 3.78% | 4.37% | 2.42% | 3.70% | 6.60% | 2.85% | 3.36% | 3.45% |
IOO iShares Global 100 ETF | 0.84% | 0.92% | 1.08% | 1.49% | 2.00% | 1.53% | 1.49% | 2.02% | 2.54% | 2.23% | 2.75% | 2.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFIVX and IOO have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IOO has higher volatility (4.82%) compared to DFIVX (4.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFIVX dropped -66.61% vs IOO's -55.85%.
DFIVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFIVX and IOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer