DFIS vs. DFAX
DFIS (Dimensional International Small Cap ETF) and DFAX (Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DFIS is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional, while DFAX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Country World ex USA Index. DFIS is actively managed, while DFAX is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DFIS returned 19.89%/yr vs 21.17%/yr for DFAX. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DFIS charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for DFAX.
Performance
DFIS vs. DFAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFIS achieves a 11.25% return, which is significantly lower than DFAX's 15.50% return.
DFIS
- 1D
- 0.88%
- 1M
- 2.95%
- YTD
- 11.25%
- 6M
- 14.62%
- 1Y
- 28.32%
- 3Y*
- 19.89%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DFAX
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 2.61%
- YTD
- 15.50%
- 6M
- 18.24%
- 1Y
- 34.48%
- 3Y*
- 21.17%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DFIS vs. DFAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFIS Dimensional International Small Cap ETF | 11.25% | 37.49% | 3.80% | 15.19% | -12.94% |
DFAX Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF | 15.50% | 35.42% | 4.78% | 16.66% | -10.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFIS and DFAX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2022 | 0.94 |
The correlation between DFIS and DFAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
DFIS vs. DFAX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DFIS
DFAX
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Technology
Energy
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Communication Services
Utilities
Industrials
DFIS
DFAX
Basic Materials
DFIS
DFAX
Consumer Cyclical
DFIS
DFAX
Financial Services
DFIS
DFAX
Technology
DFIS
DFAX
Energy
DFIS
DFAX
Healthcare
DFIS
DFAX
Consumer Defensive
DFIS
DFAX
Real Estate
DFIS
DFAX
Communication Services
DFIS
DFAX
Utilities
DFIS
DFAX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFIS vs. DFAX — Risk / Return Rank
DFIS
DFAX
DFIS vs. DFAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional International Small Cap ETF (DFIS) and Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFIS | DFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.43 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.29 | 3.12 | -0.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.82 | 12.33 | -3.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFIS | DFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.96 | 2.34 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | 0.65 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
DFIS vs. DFAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFIS drawdown since its inception was -27.23%, roughly equal to the maximum DFAX drawdown of -28.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFIS and DFAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFIS | DFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.23% | -28.15% | +0.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.44% | -11.11% | -1.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.55% | -13.89% | +0.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.04% | -0.76% | -0.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.17% | -6.67% | +0.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.22% | 2.80% | +0.42% |
Volatility
DFIS vs. DFAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Dimensional International Small Cap ETF (DFIS) is 4.72%, while Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAX) has a volatility of 5.10%. This indicates that DFIS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFIS | DFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.72% | 5.10% | -0.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.06% | 12.67% | -0.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.53% | 14.82% | -0.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.32% | 15.98% | +1.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.32% | 15.98% | +1.34% |
DFIS vs. DFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFIS has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than DFAX's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFIS vs. DFAX - Dividend Comparison
DFIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, less than DFAX's 2.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFAX Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF | 2.21% | 2.58% | 2.98% | 3.01% | 3.30% | 1.40% |
DFIS Dimensional International Small Cap ETF | 2.00% | 2.23% | 2.19% | 2.36% | 1.13% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, DFIS and DFAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
DFAX has higher volatility (5.10%) compared to DFIS (4.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFIS dropped -27.23% vs DFAX's -28.15%.
On 3-year performance, DFAX leads with 21.17% vs 19.89% for DFIS. On fees, DFAX is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, DFIS has been the lower-risk option at 4.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DFAX has performed better with a 21.17% return vs 19.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DFAX is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for DFIS.
DFAX has the higher dividend yield at 2.21%, compared with 2.00% for DFIS.
DFIS is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while DFAX is Foreign Large Cap Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for DFIS and 0.30% for DFAX.
DFAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFIS and DFAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer