PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFIS vs. DFAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFIS vs. DFAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional International Small Cap ETF (DFIS) and Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFIS achieves a 11.25% return, which is significantly lower than DFAX's 15.50% return.


DFIS

1D
0.88%
1M
2.95%
YTD
11.25%
6M
14.62%
1Y
28.32%
3Y*
19.89%
5Y*
10Y*

DFAX

1D
0.24%
1M
2.61%
YTD
15.50%
6M
18.24%
1Y
34.48%
3Y*
21.17%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFIS vs. DFAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
DFIS
Dimensional International Small Cap ETF
11.25%37.49%3.80%15.19%-12.94%
DFAX
Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF
15.50%35.42%4.78%16.66%-10.92%

Correlation

The correlation between DFIS and DFAX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2022

0.94

The correlation between DFIS and DFAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

DFIS vs. DFAX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DFIS
DFAX

Industrials

23.9%
16.1%

Basic Materials

14.2%
13.2%

Consumer Cyclical

13.5%
10.9%

Financial Services

12.0%
17.9%

Technology

9.6%
10.9%

Energy

6.0%
6.6%

Healthcare

5.2%
5.6%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%
3.9%

Real Estate

3.7%
3.1%

Communication Services

3.6%
3.5%

Utilities

3.3%
4.2%

Industrials

DFIS
23.9%
DFAX
16.1%

Basic Materials

DFIS
14.2%
DFAX
13.2%

Consumer Cyclical

DFIS
13.5%
DFAX
10.9%

Financial Services

DFIS
12.0%
DFAX
17.9%

Technology

DFIS
9.6%
DFAX
10.9%

Energy

DFIS
6.0%
DFAX
6.6%

Healthcare

DFIS
5.2%
DFAX
5.6%

Consumer Defensive

DFIS
5.0%
DFAX
3.9%

Real Estate

DFIS
3.7%
DFAX
3.1%

Communication Services

DFIS
3.6%
DFAX
3.5%

Utilities

DFIS
3.3%
DFAX
4.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFIS vs. DFAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFIS
DFIS Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
DFIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFIS Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
DFIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFIS Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

DFAX
DFAX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
DFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
DFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFIS vs. DFAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional International Small Cap ETF (DFIS) and Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFISDFAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.43

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.29

3.12

-0.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.82

12.33

-3.50

DFIS vs. DFAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFIS Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is comparable to the DFAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFIS and DFAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFISDFAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.96

2.34

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.65

+0.03

Drawdowns

DFIS vs. DFAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFIS drawdown since its inception was -27.23%, roughly equal to the maximum DFAX drawdown of -28.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFIS and DFAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFISDFAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.23%

-28.15%

+0.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.44%

-11.11%

-1.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.55%

-13.89%

+0.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.04%

-0.76%

-0.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.17%

-6.67%

+0.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.22%

2.80%

+0.42%

Volatility

DFIS vs. DFAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dimensional International Small Cap ETF (DFIS) is 4.72%, while Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAX) has a volatility of 5.10%. This indicates that DFIS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFISDFAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.72%

5.10%

-0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.06%

12.67%

-0.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.53%

14.82%

-0.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.32%

15.98%

+1.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.32%

15.98%

+1.34%

DFIS vs. DFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFIS has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than DFAX's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFIS vs. DFAX - Dividend Comparison

DFIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, less than DFAX's 2.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
DFAX
Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF
2.21%2.58%2.98%3.01%3.30%1.40%
DFIS
Dimensional International Small Cap ETF
2.00%2.23%2.19%2.36%1.13%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, DFIS and DFAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DFAX has higher volatility (5.10%) compared to DFIS (4.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFIS dropped -27.23% vs DFAX's -28.15%.

On 3-year performance, DFAX leads with 21.17% vs 19.89% for DFIS. On fees, DFAX is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, DFIS has been the lower-risk option at 4.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DFAX has performed better with a 21.17% return vs 19.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DFAX is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for DFIS.

DFAX has the higher dividend yield at 2.21%, compared with 2.00% for DFIS.

DFIS is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while DFAX is Foreign Large Cap Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for DFIS and 0.30% for DFAX.

DFAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFIS and DFAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer