DFIP vs. DFUS
DFIP (Dimensional Inflation-Protected Securities ETF) and DFUS (Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DFIP is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund actively managed by Dimensional, while DFUS is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, DFIP returned 4.12%/yr vs 22.72%/yr for DFUS. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DFIP charges 0.11%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for DFUS.
Performance
DFIP vs. DFUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFIP achieves a 1.51% return, which is significantly lower than DFUS's 11.74% return.
DFIP
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- -0.12%
- YTD
- 1.51%
- 6M
- 1.14%
- 1Y
- 4.69%
- 3Y*
- 4.12%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DFUS
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 4.83%
- YTD
- 11.74%
- 6M
- 11.52%
- 1Y
- 29.16%
- 3Y*
- 22.72%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DFIP vs. DFUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFIP Dimensional Inflation-Protected Securities ETF | 1.51% | 7.54% | 1.72% | 4.07% | -12.39% | -0.05% |
DFUS Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF | 11.74% | 17.46% | 24.34% | 26.36% | -18.34% | 0.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFIP and DFUS is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2021 | 0.18 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFIP vs. DFUS — Risk / Return Rank
DFIP
DFUS
DFIP vs. DFUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (DFIP) and Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF (DFUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFIP | DFUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.43 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.29 | 3.27 | -0.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.98 | 14.97 | -7.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFIP | DFUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.38 | 2.40 | -1.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.04 | 0.79 | -0.75 |
Drawdowns
DFIP vs. DFUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFIP drawdown since its inception was -14.96%, smaller than the maximum DFUS drawdown of -24.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFIP and DFUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFIP | DFUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.96% | -24.62% | +9.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.06% | -8.96% | +6.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.82% | -19.44% | +14.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.44% | -0.23% | -0.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.94% | -5.81% | -1.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.68% | 1.95% | -1.27% |
Volatility
DFIP vs. DFUS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Dimensional Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (DFIP) is 0.93%, while Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF (DFUS) has a volatility of 3.01%. This indicates that DFIP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFIP | DFUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.93% | 3.01% | -2.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.32% | 9.19% | -6.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.44% | 12.22% | -8.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.81% | 17.21% | -10.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.81% | 17.21% | -10.40% |
DFIP vs. DFUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFIP has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is higher than DFUS's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
DFIP vs. DFUS - Dividend Comparison
DFIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.88%, more than DFUS's 0.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFIP Dimensional Inflation-Protected Securities ETF | 3.88% | 4.70% | 3.69% | 3.68% | 5.97% | 0.56% |
DFUS Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF | 0.83% | 0.88% | 1.04% | 1.33% | 1.48% | 0.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFIP and DFUS have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DFUS has higher volatility (3.01%) compared to DFIP (0.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFIP dropped -14.96% vs DFUS's -24.62%.
On 3-year performance, DFUS leads with 22.72% vs 4.12% for DFIP. On fees, DFUS is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, DFIP has been the lower-risk option at 0.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DFUS has performed better with a 22.72% return vs 4.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DFUS is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.11% for DFIP.
DFIP has the higher dividend yield at 3.88%, compared with 0.83% for DFUS.
DFIP is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while DFUS is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.11% for DFIP and 0.09% for DFUS.
DFUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFIP and DFUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer