PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFIP vs. DFUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFIP vs. DFUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (DFIP) and Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF (DFUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFIP achieves a 1.51% return, which is significantly lower than DFUS's 11.74% return.


DFIP

1D
0.02%
1M
-0.12%
YTD
1.51%
6M
1.14%
1Y
4.69%
3Y*
4.12%
5Y*
10Y*

DFUS

1D
0.44%
1M
4.83%
YTD
11.74%
6M
11.52%
1Y
29.16%
3Y*
22.72%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFIP vs. DFUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
DFIP
Dimensional Inflation-Protected Securities ETF
1.51%7.54%1.72%4.07%-12.39%-0.05%
DFUS
Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF
11.74%17.46%24.34%26.36%-18.34%0.68%

Correlation

The correlation between DFIP and DFUS is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2021

0.18

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFIP vs. DFUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFIP
DFIP Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
DFIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFIP Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
DFIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFIP Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

DFUS
DFUS Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
DFUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFUS Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
DFUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFUS Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFIP vs. DFUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (DFIP) and Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF (DFUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFIPDFUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.43

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.29

3.27

-0.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.98

14.97

-7.99

DFIP vs. DFUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFIP Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is lower than the DFUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFIP and DFUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFIPDFUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.38

2.40

-1.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.04

0.79

-0.75

Drawdowns

DFIP vs. DFUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFIP drawdown since its inception was -14.96%, smaller than the maximum DFUS drawdown of -24.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFIP and DFUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFIPDFUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.96%

-24.62%

+9.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.06%

-8.96%

+6.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.82%

-19.44%

+14.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.44%

-0.23%

-0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.94%

-5.81%

-1.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.68%

1.95%

-1.27%

Volatility

DFIP vs. DFUS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dimensional Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (DFIP) is 0.93%, while Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF (DFUS) has a volatility of 3.01%. This indicates that DFIP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFIPDFUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.93%

3.01%

-2.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.32%

9.19%

-6.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.44%

12.22%

-8.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.81%

17.21%

-10.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.81%

17.21%

-10.40%

DFIP vs. DFUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFIP has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is higher than DFUS's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DFIP vs. DFUS - Dividend Comparison

DFIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.88%, more than DFUS's 0.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
DFIP
Dimensional Inflation-Protected Securities ETF
3.88%4.70%3.69%3.68%5.97%0.56%
DFUS
Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF
0.83%0.88%1.04%1.33%1.48%0.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFIP and DFUS have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DFUS has higher volatility (3.01%) compared to DFIP (0.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFIP dropped -14.96% vs DFUS's -24.62%.

On 3-year performance, DFUS leads with 22.72% vs 4.12% for DFIP. On fees, DFUS is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, DFIP has been the lower-risk option at 0.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DFUS has performed better with a 22.72% return vs 4.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DFUS is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.11% for DFIP.

DFIP has the higher dividend yield at 3.88%, compared with 0.83% for DFUS.

DFIP is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while DFUS is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.11% for DFIP and 0.09% for DFUS.

DFUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFIP and DFUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer