DFIGX vs. FUTBX
Compare and contrast key facts about DFA Intermediate Government Fixed Income Portfolio (DFIGX) and Fidelity SAI U.S. Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUTBX).
DFIGX is managed by Dimensional. It was launched on Oct 18, 1990. FUTBX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Mar 1, 2016.
Performance
DFIGX vs. FUTBX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DFIGX vs. FUTBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFIGX DFA Intermediate Government Fixed Income Portfolio | -0.02% | 6.33% | 0.47% | 4.58% | -13.12% | -3.14% | 9.10% | 7.22% | 0.92% | 1.65% |
FUTBX Fidelity SAI U.S. Treasury Bond Index Fund | -0.23% | 6.12% | 0.70% | 4.19% | -13.00% | -2.54% | 7.76% | 7.30% | 0.95% | 2.28% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFIGX achieves a -0.02% return, which is significantly higher than FUTBX's -0.23% return.
DFIGX
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- -1.94%
- YTD
- -0.02%
- 6M
- 0.91%
- 1Y
- 2.96%
- 3Y*
- 2.65%
- 5Y*
- -0.29%
- 10Y*
- 0.90%
FUTBX
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- -2.12%
- YTD
- -0.23%
- 6M
- 0.50%
- 1Y
- 2.86%
- 3Y*
- 2.46%
- 5Y*
- -0.31%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DFIGX vs. FUTBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFIGX has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is higher than FUTBX's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
DFIGX vs. FUTBX — Risk / Return Rank
DFIGX
FUTBX
DFIGX vs. FUTBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Intermediate Government Fixed Income Portfolio (DFIGX) and Fidelity SAI U.S. Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUTBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFIGX | FUTBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.74 | 0.79 | -0.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.10 | 1.14 | -0.05 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.14 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.40 | 1.43 | -0.03 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.34 | 3.64 | -0.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFIGX | FUTBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 | 0.79 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.05 | -0.05 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.99 | 0.25 | +0.74 |
Correlation
The correlation between DFIGX and FUTBX is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
DFIGX vs. FUTBX - Dividend Comparison
DFIGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.30%, less than FUTBX's 3.30% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFIGX DFA Intermediate Government Fixed Income Portfolio | 2.30% | 2.22% | 2.82% | 2.33% | 1.78% | 2.36% | 4.14% | 2.16% | 2.19% | 1.57% | 1.66% | 2.49% |
FUTBX Fidelity SAI U.S. Treasury Bond Index Fund | 3.30% | 3.43% | 2.90% | 2.12% | 1.12% | 0.86% | 4.54% | 2.75% | 2.05% | 1.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
DFIGX vs. FUTBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFIGX drawdown since its inception was -19.56%, roughly equal to the maximum FUTBX drawdown of -19.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFIGX and FUTBX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFIGX | FUTBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.56% | -19.69% | +0.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.58% | -2.71% | +0.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.62% | -17.03% | -0.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.56% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.39% | -7.89% | +0.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.09% | -6.94% | +3.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.08% | 1.07% | +0.01% |
Volatility
DFIGX vs. FUTBX - Volatility Comparison
DFA Intermediate Government Fixed Income Portfolio (DFIGX) and Fidelity SAI U.S. Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUTBX) have volatilities of 1.53% and 1.46%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DFIGX | FUTBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.53% | 1.46% | +0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.60% | 2.54% | +0.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.42% | 4.25% | +0.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.21% | 5.79% | +0.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.35% | 5.17% | +0.18% |