DFIC vs. GMOI
DFIC (DFA Dimensional International Core Equity 2 ETF) and GMOI (GMO International Value ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. DFIC is actively managed, while GMOI is passively managed. Over the past year, DFIC returned 24.23% vs 35.21% for GMOI. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DFIC charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for GMOI.
Performance
DFIC vs. GMOI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFIC achieves a 7.68% return, which is significantly lower than GMOI's 11.52% return.
DFIC
- 1D
- -2.96%
- 1M
- -2.35%
- YTD
- 7.68%
- 6M
- 7.21%
- 1Y
- 24.23%
- 3Y*
- 18.77%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GMOI
- 1D
- -1.03%
- 1M
- -1.76%
- YTD
- 11.52%
- 6M
- 11.19%
- 1Y
- 35.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DFIC vs. GMOI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
DFIC DFA Dimensional International Core Equity 2 ETF | 7.68% | 37.09% | -3.87% |
GMOI GMO International Value ETF | 11.52% | 45.64% | -4.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFIC and GMOI is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2024 | 0.92 |
The correlation between DFIC and GMOI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFIC vs. GMOI — Risk / Return Rank
DFIC
GMOI
DFIC vs. GMOI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Dimensional International Core Equity 2 ETF (DFIC) and GMO International Value ETF (GMOI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DFIC | GMOI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.47 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.21 | 4.23 | -2.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.69 | 16.65 | -7.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DFIC vs. GMOI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFIC drawdown since its inception was -24.40%, which is greater than GMOI's maximum drawdown of -14.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFIC and GMOI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFIC | GMOI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.40% | -14.67% | -9.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.00% | -8.36% | -2.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.66% | -2.63% | -1.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.51% | -1.69% | -2.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.79% | 2.12% | +0.67% |
Volatility
DFIC vs. GMOI - Volatility Comparison
DFA Dimensional International Core Equity 2 ETF (DFIC) has a higher volatility of 5.44% compared to GMO International Value ETF (GMOI) at 3.99%. This indicates that DFIC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GMOI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFIC | GMOI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.44% | 3.99% | +1.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.46% | 10.67% | +1.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.60% | 13.40% | +1.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.29% | 15.57% | +0.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.29% | 15.57% | +0.72% |
DFIC vs. GMOI - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFIC has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than GMOI's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFIC vs. GMOI - Dividend Comparison
DFIC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.33%, less than GMOI's 2.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFIC DFA Dimensional International Core Equity 2 ETF | 2.33% | 2.54% | 2.87% | 2.55% | 1.47% |
GMOI GMO International Value ETF | 2.45% | 2.74% | 0.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, DFIC and GMOI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
DFIC has higher volatility (5.44%) compared to GMOI (3.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFIC dropped -24.40% vs GMOI's -14.67%.
On 1-year performance, GMOI leads with 35.21% vs 24.23% for DFIC. On fees, DFIC is cheaper at 0.22% per year. On volatility, GMOI has been the lower-risk option at 3.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GMOI has performed better with a 35.21% return vs 24.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DFIC is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for GMOI.
GMOI has the higher dividend yield at 2.45%, compared with 2.33% for DFIC.
They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and GMO. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for DFIC and 0.60% for GMOI.
GMOI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFIC and GMOI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer