DFIC vs. DFSV

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about DFA Dimensional International Core Equity 2 ETF (DFIC) and Dimensional US Small Cap Value ETF (DFSV).

DFIC and DFSV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DFIC is an actively managed fund by Dimensional. It was launched on Mar 23, 2022. DFSV is an actively managed fund by Dimensional. It was launched on Feb 23, 2022.

Performance

DFIC vs. DFSV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA Dimensional International Core Equity 2 ETF (DFIC) and Dimensional US Small Cap Value ETF (DFSV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

DFIC vs. DFSV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
DFIC DFA Dimensional International Core Equity 2 ETF	3.32%	37.09%	4.10%	17.32%	-9.27%
DFSV Dimensional US Small Cap Value ETF	6.90%	8.59%	7.13%	19.26%	-3.98%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFIC achieves a 3.32% return, which is significantly lower than DFSV's 6.90% return.

DFIC

• 1D: 3.02%
• 1M: -7.56%
• YTD: 3.32%
• 6M: 9.34%
• 1Y: 31.43%
• 3Y*: 17.04%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DFSV

• 1D: 1.98%
• 1M: -3.01%
• YTD: 6.90%
• 6M: 10.89%
• 1Y: 26.57%
• 3Y*: 13.70%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFIC vs. DFSV - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFIC has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than DFSV's 0.31% expense ratio.

DFSV

Dimensional US Small Cap Value ETF

DFIC

DFA Dimensional International Core Equity 2 ETF

Return for Risk

DFIC vs. DFSV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFIC

DFIC Risk / Return Rank: 90
DFIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
DFIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
DFIC Omega Ratio Rank: 92
DFIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
DFIC Martin Ratio Rank: 90

DFSV

DFSV Risk / Return Rank: 68
DFSV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
DFSV Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
DFSV Omega Ratio Rank: 66
DFSV Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
DFSV Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFIC vs. DFSV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Dimensional International Core Equity 2 ETF (DFIC) and Dimensional US Small Cap Value ETF (DFSV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DFIC	DFSV	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.93	1.12	+0.81
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.57	1.67	+0.90
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.23	+0.16
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.75	1.73	+1.01
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	11.02	6.49	+4.53
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DFIC vs. DFSV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFIC Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is higher than the DFSV Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFIC and DFSV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DFIC	DFSV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.93	1.12	+0.81
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.74	0.46	+0.28

Correlation

The correlation between DFIC and DFSV is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

DFIC vs. DFSV - Dividend Comparison

DFIC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.43%, more than DFSV's 1.53% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
DFIC DFA Dimensional International Core Equity 2 ETF	2.43%	2.54%	2.87%	2.55%	1.47%
DFSV Dimensional US Small Cap Value ETF	1.53%	1.53%	1.31%	1.29%	0.90%

Drawdowns

DFIC vs. DFSV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFIC drawdown since its inception was -24.40%, smaller than the maximum DFSV drawdown of -28.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFIC and DFSV.

Drawdown Indicators

	DFIC	DFSV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.40%	-28.02%	+3.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.00%	-15.38%	+4.38%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.56%	-5.67%	-1.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.64%	-6.93%	+2.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.74%	4.11%	-1.37%

Volatility

DFIC vs. DFSV - Volatility Comparison

DFA Dimensional International Core Equity 2 ETF (DFIC) has a higher volatility of 7.20% compared to Dimensional US Small Cap Value ETF (DFSV) at 5.36%. This indicates that DFIC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFSV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DFIC	DFSV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.20%	5.36%	+1.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.43%	13.02%	-2.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.43%	23.83%	-7.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.19%	22.56%	-6.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.19%	22.56%	-6.37%