DFGX vs. BNDX
Compare and contrast key facts about Dimensional Global Ex US Core Fixed Income ETF (DFGX) and Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX).
DFGX and BNDX are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DFGX is an actively managed fund by Dimensional. It was launched on Nov 7, 2023. BNDX is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Global Aggregate ex-USD Float Adjusted RIC Capped Index (USD Hedged). It was launched on May 31, 2013.
Performance
DFGX vs. BNDX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DFGX vs. BNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DFGX Dimensional Global Ex US Core Fixed Income ETF | -0.35% | 3.46% | 3.75% | 4.95% |
BNDX Vanguard Total International Bond ETF | -0.13% | 2.86% | 3.57% | 4.81% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFGX achieves a -0.35% return, which is significantly lower than BNDX's -0.13% return.
DFGX
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- -2.47%
- YTD
- -0.35%
- 6M
- -0.10%
- 1Y
- 3.17%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BNDX
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- -2.14%
- YTD
- -0.13%
- 6M
- 0.17%
- 1Y
- 2.81%
- 3Y*
- 3.83%
- 5Y*
- 0.17%
- 10Y*
- 1.73%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DFGX vs. BNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFGX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than BNDX's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
DFGX vs. BNDX — Risk / Return Rank
DFGX
BNDX
DFGX vs. BNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Global Ex US Core Fixed Income ETF (DFGX) and Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFGX | BNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.71 | 0.88 | -0.16 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.00 | 1.23 | -0.23 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.16 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.92 | 0.96 | -0.03 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.61 | 3.94 | -0.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFGX | BNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 | 0.88 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.04 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.43 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.09 | 0.60 | +0.49 |
Correlation
The correlation between DFGX and BNDX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
DFGX vs. BNDX - Dividend Comparison
DFGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.78%, less than BNDX's 4.45% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFGX Dimensional Global Ex US Core Fixed Income ETF | 2.78% | 2.84% | 4.61% | 0.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BNDX Vanguard Total International Bond ETF | 4.45% | 4.39% | 4.18% | 4.42% | 1.51% | 3.74% | 1.11% | 3.40% | 3.01% | 2.23% | 1.89% | 1.63% |
Drawdowns
DFGX vs. BNDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFGX drawdown since its inception was -3.32%, smaller than the maximum BNDX drawdown of -16.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFGX and BNDX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFGX | BNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.32% | -16.23% | +12.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.32% | -2.93% | -0.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.86% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -16.23% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.47% | -2.14% | -0.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.70% | -3.10% | +2.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.85% | 0.71% | +0.14% |
Volatility
DFGX vs. BNDX - Volatility Comparison
Dimensional Global Ex US Core Fixed Income ETF (DFGX) has a higher volatility of 1.99% compared to Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX) at 1.73%. This indicates that DFGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DFGX | BNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.99% | 1.73% | +0.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.69% | 2.28% | +0.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.45% | 3.21% | +1.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.59% | 4.81% | -0.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.59% | 4.05% | +0.54% |