PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFGFX vs. DGFFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFGFX vs. DGFFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA Two Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio (DFGFX) and Destinations Global Fixed Income Opportunities Fund (DGFFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFGFX achieves a 1.60% return, which is significantly lower than DGFFX's 2.55% return.


DFGFX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.51%
YTD
1.60%
6M
1.90%
1Y
2.64%
3Y*
4.29%
5Y*
2.30%
10Y*
1.81%

DGFFX

1D
0.11%
1M
0.40%
YTD
2.55%
6M
2.95%
1Y
6.40%
3Y*
7.40%
5Y*
3.69%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFGFX vs. DGFFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DFGFX
DFA Two Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio
1.60%2.89%5.36%4.95%-2.62%-0.37%0.88%2.87%1.91%0.62%
DGFFX
Destinations Global Fixed Income Opportunities Fund
2.55%5.84%8.04%7.82%-6.09%4.91%3.59%6.64%-0.35%3.57%

Correlation

The correlation between DFGFX and DGFFX is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2017

0.15

The correlation between DFGFX and DGFFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (3 years) to 0.20 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFGFX vs. DGFFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFGFX
DFGFX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
DFGFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFGFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFGFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
DFGFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFGFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

DGFFX
DGFFX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
DGFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
DGFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFGFX vs. DGFFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Two Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio (DFGFX) and Destinations Global Fixed Income Opportunities Fund (DGFFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFGFXDGFFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.36

2.02

+0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.89

6.93

-5.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.81

31.39

-25.58

DFGFX vs. DGFFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFGFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is lower than the DGFFX Sharpe Ratio of 4.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFGFX and DGFFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFGFXDGFFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.69

4.04

-2.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.28

1.60

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.29

1.53

+0.75

Drawdowns

DFGFX vs. DGFFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFGFX drawdown since its inception was -4.00%, smaller than the maximum DGFFX drawdown of -12.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFGFX and DGFFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFGFXDGFFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.00%

-12.69%

+8.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.41%

-1.19%

-0.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.12%

-3.38%

+1.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-4.00%

-8.17%

+4.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-4.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.23%

-1.33%

+1.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.46%

0.70%

-0.24%

Volatility

DFGFX vs. DGFFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DFA Two Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio (DFGFX) is 0.28%, while Destinations Global Fixed Income Opportunities Fund (DGFFX) has a volatility of 0.68%. This indicates that DFGFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DGFFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFGFXDGFFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.28%

0.68%

-0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.52%

1.48%

-0.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.58%

2.05%

-0.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.81%

2.42%

-0.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.36%

2.60%

-1.24%

DFGFX vs. DGFFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFGFX has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than DGFFX's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFGFX vs. DGFFX - Dividend Comparison

DFGFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.10%, less than DGFFX's 6.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFGFX
DFA Two Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio
3.10%2.67%4.77%3.19%1.17%0.23%0.57%2.24%2.21%1.54%0.65%0.02%
DGFFX
Destinations Global Fixed Income Opportunities Fund
6.24%5.52%6.81%4.95%3.37%4.14%4.22%4.18%3.79%2.94%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFGFX and DGFFX have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DGFFX has higher volatility (0.68%) compared to DFGFX (0.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFGFX dropped -4.00% vs DGFFX's -12.69%.

DGFFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.04 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFGFX and DGFFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer