PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFGFX vs. DFLVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFGFX vs. DFLVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA Two Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio (DFGFX) and DFA U.S. Large Cap Value Portfolio (DFLVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFGFX achieves a 1.60% return, which is significantly lower than DFLVX's 16.01% return. Over the past 10 years, DFGFX has underperformed DFLVX with an annualized return of 1.81%, while DFLVX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.94% annualized return.


DFGFX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.51%
YTD
1.60%
6M
1.90%
1Y
2.64%
3Y*
4.29%
5Y*
2.30%
10Y*
1.81%

DFLVX

1D
1.10%
1M
5.70%
YTD
16.01%
6M
17.69%
1Y
33.76%
3Y*
19.38%
5Y*
11.03%
10Y*
11.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFGFX vs. DFLVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DFGFX
DFA Two Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio
1.60%2.89%5.36%4.95%-2.62%-0.37%0.88%2.87%1.91%0.93%
DFLVX
DFA U.S. Large Cap Value Portfolio
16.01%16.36%12.76%11.52%-5.81%30.40%-0.58%25.46%-11.68%18.50%

Correlation

The correlation between DFGFX and DFLVX is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 1996

-0.08

The correlation between DFGFX and DFLVX shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (all time) to 0.06 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFGFX vs. DFLVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFGFX
DFGFX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
DFGFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFGFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFGFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
DFGFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFGFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

DFLVX
DFLVX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
DFLVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFLVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFLVX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
DFLVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFLVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFGFX vs. DFLVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Two Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio (DFGFX) and DFA U.S. Large Cap Value Portfolio (DFLVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFGFXDFLVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.36

1.56

+0.79

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.89

6.02

-4.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.81

22.08

-16.27

DFGFX vs. DFLVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFGFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is lower than the DFLVX Sharpe Ratio of 3.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFGFX and DFLVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFGFXDFLVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.69

3.20

-1.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.28

0.70

+0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.34

0.65

+0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.29

0.53

+1.76

Drawdowns

DFGFX vs. DFLVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFGFX drawdown since its inception was -4.00%, smaller than the maximum DFLVX drawdown of -65.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFGFX and DFLVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFGFXDFLVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.00%

-65.65%

+61.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.41%

-5.86%

+4.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.12%

-16.64%

+14.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-4.00%

-19.83%

+15.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-4.00%

-41.79%

+37.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.23%

-8.48%

+8.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.46%

1.59%

-1.13%

Volatility

DFGFX vs. DFLVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DFA Two Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio (DFGFX) is 0.28%, while DFA U.S. Large Cap Value Portfolio (DFLVX) has a volatility of 2.86%. This indicates that DFGFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFLVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFGFXDFLVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.28%

2.86%

-2.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.52%

8.21%

-7.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.58%

11.02%

-9.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.81%

15.88%

-14.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.36%

18.38%

-17.02%

DFGFX vs. DFLVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFGFX has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than DFLVX's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DFGFX vs. DFLVX - Dividend Comparison

DFGFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.10%, more than DFLVX's 1.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFGFX
DFA Two Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio
3.10%2.67%4.77%3.19%1.17%0.23%0.57%2.24%2.21%1.54%0.65%0.02%
DFLVX
DFA U.S. Large Cap Value Portfolio
1.45%1.71%1.87%3.65%4.56%5.90%1.97%4.04%7.83%6.06%3.77%6.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFGFX and DFLVX have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DFLVX has higher volatility (2.86%) compared to DFGFX (0.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFGFX dropped -4.00% vs DFLVX's -65.65%.

DFLVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.20 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFGFX and DFLVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer