DFGBX vs. TPINX
Compare and contrast key facts about DFA Five Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio (DFGBX) and Templeton Global Bond Fund (TPINX).
DFGBX is managed by Dimensional. It was launched on Nov 5, 1990. TPINX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Sep 17, 1986.
Performance
DFGBX vs. TPINX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DFGBX vs. TPINX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFGBX DFA Five Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio | 0.25% | 3.13% | 5.37% | 5.00% | -6.63% | -1.03% | 1.52% | 4.04% | 1.68% | 0.88% |
TPINX Templeton Global Bond Fund | -1.01% | 15.02% | -11.95% | 2.45% | -6.17% | -5.06% | -4.41% | 0.63% | 1.26% | 2.36% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFGBX achieves a 0.25% return, which is significantly higher than TPINX's -1.01% return. Over the past 10 years, DFGBX has outperformed TPINX with an annualized return of 1.23%, while TPINX has yielded a comparatively lower -0.30% annualized return.
DFGBX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -0.84%
- YTD
- 0.25%
- 6M
- 1.12%
- 1Y
- 2.26%
- 3Y*
- 4.09%
- 5Y*
- 1.11%
- 10Y*
- 1.23%
TPINX
- 1D
- 1.01%
- 1M
- -4.36%
- YTD
- -1.01%
- 6M
- -0.98%
- 1Y
- 8.83%
- 3Y*
- 0.29%
- 5Y*
- -1.20%
- 10Y*
- -0.30%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DFGBX vs. TPINX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFGBX has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than TPINX's 0.94% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DFGBX vs. TPINX — Risk / Return Rank
DFGBX
TPINX
DFGBX vs. TPINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Five Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio (DFGBX) and Templeton Global Bond Fund (TPINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFGBX | TPINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.40 | 1.25 | +0.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.64 | 1.75 | -0.12 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.23 | +0.27 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.72 | 1.54 | +0.18 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.47 | 6.45 | -0.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFGBX | TPINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.40 | 1.25 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | -0.15 | +0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | -0.04 | +0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 0.76 | -0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between DFGBX and TPINX is 0.12, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
DFGBX vs. TPINX - Dividend Comparison
DFGBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.46%, less than TPINX's 5.23% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFGBX DFA Five Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio | 3.46% | 2.91% | 4.69% | 3.61% | 1.63% | 0.73% | 0.03% | 2.30% | 4.74% | 0.89% | 1.16% | 1.72% |
TPINX Templeton Global Bond Fund | 5.23% | 4.29% | 5.77% | 3.87% | 5.17% | 5.38% | 4.59% | 6.12% | 6.53% | 3.34% | 2.33% | 3.11% |
Drawdowns
DFGBX vs. TPINX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFGBX drawdown since its inception was -9.63%, smaller than the maximum TPINX drawdown of -26.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFGBX and TPINX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFGBX | TPINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.63% | -26.45% | +16.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.38% | -6.36% | +4.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.63% | -19.15% | +9.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -9.63% | -26.45% | +16.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.03% | -15.73% | +14.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.94% | -4.80% | +3.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.43% | 1.52% | -1.09% |
Volatility
DFGBX vs. TPINX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for DFA Five Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio (DFGBX) is 0.76%, while Templeton Global Bond Fund (TPINX) has a volatility of 3.67%. This indicates that DFGBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TPINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DFGBX | TPINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.76% | 3.67% | -2.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.98% | 5.27% | -4.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.64% | 7.63% | -5.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.16% | 8.02% | -5.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.93% | 7.30% | -5.37% |