PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFGBX vs. PGGIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFGBX vs. PGGIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA Five Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio (DFGBX) and Putnam Global Income Trust (PGGIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFGBX achieves a 1.40% return, which is significantly higher than PGGIX's -0.38% return. Over the past 10 years, DFGBX has outperformed PGGIX with an annualized return of 1.24%, while PGGIX has yielded a comparatively lower 0.46% annualized return.


DFGBX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.15%
6M
1.10%
YTD
1.40%
1Y
3.34%
3Y*
4.18%
5Y*
1.22%
10Y*
1.24%

PGGIX

1D
0.20%
1M
-0.65%
6M
-0.48%
YTD
-0.38%
1Y
2.15%
3Y*
3.00%
5Y*
-1.85%
10Y*
0.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFGBX vs. PGGIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DFGBX
DFA Five Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio
1.40%3.13%5.37%5.00%-6.63%-1.03%1.52%4.04%1.68%0.88%
PGGIX
Putnam Global Income Trust
-0.38%6.27%-0.26%5.27%-15.05%-6.38%5.93%9.35%-2.36%7.24%

Correlation

The correlation between DFGBX and PGGIX is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 1990

0.38

Over the past year, DFGBX and PGGIX have become more correlated (0.62) than their long-term average of 0.38, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFGBX vs. PGGIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFGBX
DFGBX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
DFGBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFGBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFGBX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
DFGBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFGBX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

PGGIX
PGGIX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
PGGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PGGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
PGGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
PGGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
PGGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFGBX vs. PGGIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Five Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio (DFGBX) and Putnam Global Income Trust (PGGIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DFGBXPGGIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

1.10

+0.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.45

0.62

+1.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.61

1.69

+6.92

DFGBX vs. PGGIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFGBX Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is higher than the PGGIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFGBX and PGGIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DFGBX vs. PGGIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFGBX drawdown since its inception was -9.63%, smaller than the maximum PGGIX drawdown of -26.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFGBX and PGGIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFGBXPGGIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.63%

-26.81%

+17.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.38%

-3.14%

+1.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.67%

-5.60%

+3.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.63%

-23.33%

+13.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-9.63%

-25.24%

+15.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.40%

-11.73%

+11.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.93%

-4.52%

+3.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.39%

1.15%

-0.76%

Volatility

DFGBX vs. PGGIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DFA Five Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio (DFGBX) is 0.51%, while Putnam Global Income Trust (PGGIX) has a volatility of 0.97%. This indicates that DFGBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PGGIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFGBXPGGIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.51%

0.97%

-0.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.38%

2.82%

-1.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.53%

3.54%

-2.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.19%

5.16%

-2.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.92%

4.54%

-2.62%

DFGBX vs. PGGIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFGBX has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than PGGIX's 0.91% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFGBX vs. PGGIX - Dividend Comparison

DFGBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.62%, more than PGGIX's 3.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFGBX
DFA Five Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio
4.62%2.91%4.69%3.61%1.63%0.73%0.03%2.30%4.74%0.89%1.16%1.72%
PGGIX
Putnam Global Income Trust
3.28%3.86%2.79%2.17%2.06%1.72%1.65%2.04%2.42%3.17%3.29%2.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFGBX and PGGIX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PGGIX has higher volatility (0.97%) compared to DFGBX (0.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFGBX dropped -9.63% vs PGGIX's -26.81%.

DFGBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFGBX and PGGIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer