PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFFVX vs. QISCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFFVX vs. QISCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA U.S. Targeted Value Portfolio (DFFVX) and Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core Fund (QISCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with DFFVX having a 14.56% return and QISCX slightly higher at 15.16%. Over the past 10 years, DFFVX has underperformed QISCX with an annualized return of 11.05%, while QISCX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.40% annualized return.


DFFVX

1D
0.96%
1M
2.48%
YTD
14.56%
6M
14.49%
1Y
32.25%
3Y*
17.52%
5Y*
8.76%
10Y*
11.05%

QISCX

1D
0.55%
1M
3.49%
YTD
15.16%
6M
16.74%
1Y
41.00%
3Y*
21.33%
5Y*
9.31%
10Y*
12.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFFVX vs. QISCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DFFVX
DFA U.S. Targeted Value Portfolio
14.56%9.53%9.34%19.37%-4.66%31.53%3.78%21.51%-15.79%9.20%
QISCX
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core Fund
15.16%14.95%14.82%20.58%-23.14%30.60%17.00%18.06%-11.63%15.67%

Correlation

The correlation between DFFVX and QISCX is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2006

0.90

Over the past year, the correlation between DFFVX and QISCX has dropped to 0.17 - well below their long-term average of 0.90, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFFVX vs. QISCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFFVX
DFFVX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
DFFVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFFVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFFVX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
DFFVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFFVX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

QISCX
QISCX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
QISCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QISCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
QISCX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
QISCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
QISCX Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFFVX vs. QISCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA U.S. Targeted Value Portfolio (DFFVX) and Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core Fund (QISCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFFVXQISCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.42

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.57

3.06

+0.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.57

9.47

+2.10

DFFVX vs. QISCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFFVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is comparable to the QISCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFFVX and QISCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFFVXQISCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.03

1.96

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

0.40

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.51

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.34

+0.13

Drawdowns

DFFVX vs. QISCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFFVX drawdown since its inception was -64.21%, smaller than the maximum QISCX drawdown of -68.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFFVX and QISCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFFVXQISCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.21%

-68.05%

+3.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.70%

-13.48%

+3.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.09%

-26.51%

+0.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.09%

-32.89%

+6.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.75%

-49.02%

-1.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.60%

+0.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.71%

-15.67%

+5.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.98%

4.34%

-1.36%

Volatility

DFFVX vs. QISCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DFA U.S. Targeted Value Portfolio (DFFVX) is 4.26%, while Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core Fund (QISCX) has a volatility of 5.08%. This indicates that DFFVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QISCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFFVXQISCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.26%

5.08%

-0.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.04%

16.83%

-5.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.02%

21.02%

-4.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.54%

23.24%

-1.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.67%

24.17%

-0.50%

DFFVX vs. QISCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFFVX has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than QISCX's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFFVX vs. QISCX - Dividend Comparison

DFFVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, less than QISCX's 6.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFFVX
DFA U.S. Targeted Value Portfolio
1.50%1.69%1.40%2.26%5.17%2.74%1.52%3.82%5.95%5.16%3.95%5.84%
QISCX
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core Fund
6.92%7.97%0.35%0.31%3.77%15.41%0.44%0.36%3.81%4.49%0.85%12.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFFVX and QISCX have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QISCX has higher volatility (5.08%) compared to DFFVX (4.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFFVX dropped -64.21% vs QISCX's -68.05%.

DFFVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFFVX and QISCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer