DFFVX vs. PVCMX
Compare and contrast key facts about DFA U.S. Targeted Value Portfolio (DFFVX) and Palm Valley Capital Fund Investor Class (PVCMX).
DFFVX is managed by Dimensional. It was launched on Feb 23, 2000. PVCMX is managed by Palm Valley. It was launched on Apr 30, 2019.
Performance
DFFVX vs. PVCMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DFFVX vs. PVCMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFFVX DFA U.S. Targeted Value Portfolio | 3.27% | 9.53% | 9.34% | 19.37% | -4.66% | 31.53% | 3.78% | 10.45% |
PVCMX Palm Valley Capital Fund Investor Class | 0.58% | 4.45% | 4.24% | 9.47% | 3.17% | 3.72% | 19.13% | 1.22% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFFVX achieves a 3.27% return, which is significantly higher than PVCMX's 0.58% return.
DFFVX
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- -5.78%
- YTD
- 3.27%
- 6M
- 6.24%
- 1Y
- 21.73%
- 3Y*
- 13.51%
- 5Y*
- 8.15%
- 10Y*
- 10.23%
PVCMX
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -1.05%
- YTD
- 0.58%
- 6M
- 1.23%
- 1Y
- 4.45%
- 3Y*
- 5.18%
- 5Y*
- 4.37%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DFFVX vs. PVCMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFFVX has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than PVCMX's 1.30% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DFFVX vs. PVCMX — Risk / Return Rank
DFFVX
PVCMX
DFFVX vs. PVCMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA U.S. Targeted Value Portfolio (DFFVX) and Palm Valley Capital Fund Investor Class (PVCMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFFVX | PVCMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.97 | 0.92 | +0.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.49 | 1.44 | +0.05 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.17 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.31 | 1.52 | -0.21 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.88 | 4.20 | +0.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFFVX | PVCMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 | 0.92 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | 0.84 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 1.04 | -0.59 |
Correlation
The correlation between DFFVX and PVCMX is 0.70, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
DFFVX vs. PVCMX - Dividend Comparison
DFFVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%, less than PVCMX's 4.77% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFFVX DFA U.S. Targeted Value Portfolio | 1.66% | 1.69% | 1.40% | 2.26% | 5.17% | 2.74% | 1.52% | 3.82% | 5.95% | 5.16% | 3.95% | 5.84% |
PVCMX Palm Valley Capital Fund Investor Class | 4.77% | 4.80% | 6.95% | 4.84% | 2.30% | 1.98% | 2.70% | 0.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
DFFVX vs. PVCMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFFVX drawdown since its inception was -64.21%, which is greater than PVCMX's maximum drawdown of -7.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFFVX and PVCMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFFVX | PVCMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.21% | -7.44% | -56.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.71% | -2.81% | -11.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.09% | -7.44% | -18.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.75% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.07% | -1.85% | -6.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.76% | -1.29% | -8.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.96% | 1.02% | +2.94% |
Volatility
DFFVX vs. PVCMX - Volatility Comparison
DFA U.S. Targeted Value Portfolio (DFFVX) has a higher volatility of 4.90% compared to Palm Valley Capital Fund Investor Class (PVCMX) at 0.95%. This indicates that DFFVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PVCMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DFFVX | PVCMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.90% | 0.95% | +3.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.20% | 2.94% | +9.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.60% | 4.75% | +17.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.69% | 5.20% | +16.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.67% | 6.37% | +17.30% |