DFFVX vs. DCMSX

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

DFFVX (DFA U.S. Targeted Value Portfolio Institutional Class) and DCMSX (DFA Commodity Strategy Portfolio) are both mutual funds - DFFVX is a Small Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional, while DCMSX is a Commodities fund managed by Dimensional. Over the past 10 years, DFFVX returned 11.08%/yr vs 6.76%/yr for DCMSX. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DFFVX charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.31%/yr for DCMSX.

Performance

DFFVX vs. DCMSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA U.S. Targeted Value Portfolio Institutional Class (DFFVX) and DFA Commodity Strategy Portfolio (DCMSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFFVX achieves a 18.13% return, which is significantly lower than DCMSX's 21.72% return. Over the past 10 years, DFFVX has outperformed DCMSX with an annualized return of 11.08%, while DCMSX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.76% annualized return.

DFFVX

• 1D: 0.58%
• 1M: 0.44%
• 6M: 12.67%
• YTD: 18.13%
• 1Y: 26.91%
• 3Y*: 16.30%
• 5Y*: 10.36%
• 10Y*: 11.08%

DCMSX

• 1D: -0.36%
• 1M: -2.03%
• 6M: 16.94%
• YTD: 21.72%
• 1Y: 30.30%
• 3Y*: 13.24%
• 5Y*: 10.56%
• 10Y*: 6.76%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFFVX vs. DCMSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DFFVX DFA U.S. Targeted Value Portfolio Institutional Class	18.13%	9.53%	9.34%	19.37%	-4.66%	31.53%	3.78%	21.51%	-15.79%	9.20%
DCMSX DFA Commodity Strategy Portfolio	21.72%	15.15%	5.90%	-9.14%	11.36%	33.54%	-1.78%	7.96%	-11.22%	2.73%

Correlation

The correlation between DFFVX and DCMSX is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.00
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.10
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.20
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.24
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2010	0.28

The correlation between DFFVX and DCMSX shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (1 year) to 0.28 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

DFFVX vs. DCMSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFFVX

DFFVX Risk / Return Rank: 55
DFFVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
DFFVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
DFFVX Omega Ratio Rank: 46
DFFVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
DFFVX Martin Ratio Rank: 54

DCMSX

DCMSX Risk / Return Rank: 62
DCMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
DCMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
DCMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 68
DCMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
DCMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFFVX vs. DCMSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA U.S. Targeted Value Portfolio Institutional Class (DFFVX) and DFA Commodity Strategy Portfolio (DCMSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DFFVX	DCMSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.55	1.91	-0.36
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.35	2.54	-0.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.34	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.67	2.28	+0.39
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.69	8.00	+0.69

DFFVX vs. DCMSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFFVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is comparable to the DCMSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFFVX and DCMSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DFFVX vs. DCMSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFFVX drawdown since its inception was -64.21%, which is greater than DCMSX's maximum drawdown of -60.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFFVX and DCMSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	DFFVX	DCMSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.21%	-60.94%	-3.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.70%	-13.81%	+4.11%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.09%	-13.81%	-12.28%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.09%	-27.93%	+1.84%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-50.75%	-32.52%	-18.23%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.52%	-10.43%	+9.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.67%	-31.63%	+21.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.98%	3.91%	-0.93%

Volatility

DFFVX vs. DCMSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DFA U.S. Targeted Value Portfolio Institutional Class (DFFVX) is 3.72%, while DFA Commodity Strategy Portfolio (DCMSX) has a volatility of 4.11%. This indicates that DFFVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DCMSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DFFVX	DCMSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.72%	4.11%	-0.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.01%	14.15%	-3.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.70%	16.43%	+0.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.38%	16.28%	+5.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.54%	14.44%	+9.10%

DFFVX vs. DCMSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFFVX has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than DCMSX's 0.31% expense ratio.

Dividends

DFFVX vs. DCMSX - Dividend Comparison

DFFVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, less than DCMSX's 8.76% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DCMSX DFA Commodity Strategy Portfolio	8.76%	10.75%	2.83%	2.52%	7.46%	49.44%	0.37%	1.51%	1.63%	3.09%	0.47%	0.15%
DFFVX DFA U.S. Targeted Value Portfolio Institutional Class	1.51%	1.69%	1.40%	2.26%	5.17%	2.74%	1.52%	3.82%	5.95%	5.16%	3.95%	5.84%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DFFVX and DCMSX in my portfolio?

DFFVX and DCMSX have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DFFVX or DCMSX?

DCMSX has higher volatility (4.11%) compared to DFFVX (3.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFFVX dropped -64.21% vs DCMSX's -60.94%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DCMSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.