DFEQX vs. TNSHX
Compare and contrast key facts about DFA Short-Term Extended Quality Portfolio (DFEQX) and TIAA-CREF Short-Term Bond Index Fund (TNSHX).
DFEQX is managed by Dimensional. It was launched on Mar 4, 2009. TNSHX is managed by TIAA Investments. It was launched on Aug 7, 2015.
Performance
DFEQX vs. TNSHX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DFEQX vs. TNSHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFEQX DFA Short-Term Extended Quality Portfolio | 0.38% | 4.27% | 5.50% | 5.44% | -5.18% | -0.60% | 2.24% | 4.51% | 1.34% | 1.51% |
TNSHX TIAA-CREF Short-Term Bond Index Fund | -0.07% | 5.31% | 4.03% | 4.05% | -3.96% | -0.57% | 3.26% | 4.05% | 1.31% | 0.70% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFEQX achieves a 0.38% return, which is significantly higher than TNSHX's -0.07% return. Over the past 10 years, DFEQX has outperformed TNSHX with an annualized return of 1.91%, while TNSHX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.78% annualized return.
DFEQX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -0.46%
- YTD
- 0.38%
- 6M
- 1.41%
- 1Y
- 3.59%
- 3Y*
- 4.68%
- 5Y*
- 1.91%
- 10Y*
- 1.91%
TNSHX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.62%
- YTD
- -0.07%
- 6M
- 0.96%
- 1Y
- 3.56%
- 3Y*
- 3.89%
- 5Y*
- 1.72%
- 10Y*
- 1.78%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DFEQX vs. TNSHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFEQX has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than TNSHX's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
DFEQX vs. TNSHX — Risk / Return Rank
DFEQX
TNSHX
DFEQX vs. TNSHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Short-Term Extended Quality Portfolio (DFEQX) and TIAA-CREF Short-Term Bond Index Fund (TNSHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFEQX | TNSHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 4.12 | 1.83 | +2.28 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 6.61 | 3.29 | +3.32 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.55 | 1.45 | +1.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.59 | 3.67 | +0.92 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.66 | 13.23 | +7.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFEQX | TNSHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.12 | 1.83 | +2.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 | 0.78 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.13 | 0.99 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.11 | 1.03 | +0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between DFEQX and TNSHX is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
DFEQX vs. TNSHX - Dividend Comparison
DFEQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.94%, more than TNSHX's 3.82% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFEQX DFA Short-Term Extended Quality Portfolio | 3.94% | 3.62% | 4.40% | 3.34% | 1.78% | 1.05% | 0.47% | 2.18% | 3.14% | 1.51% | 1.59% | 1.72% |
TNSHX TIAA-CREF Short-Term Bond Index Fund | 3.82% | 4.22% | 3.94% | 2.68% | 1.00% | 1.03% | 1.81% | 2.45% | 1.80% | 1.31% | 0.98% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
DFEQX vs. TNSHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFEQX drawdown since its inception was -8.40%, which is greater than TNSHX's maximum drawdown of -5.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFEQX and TNSHX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFEQX | TNSHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.40% | -5.99% | -2.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.76% | -1.13% | +0.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -8.40% | -5.99% | -2.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -8.40% | -5.99% | -2.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.55% | -0.82% | +0.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.96% | -0.90% | -0.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.17% | 0.31% | -0.14% |
Volatility
DFEQX vs. TNSHX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for DFA Short-Term Extended Quality Portfolio (DFEQX) is 0.46%, while TIAA-CREF Short-Term Bond Index Fund (TNSHX) has a volatility of 0.52%. This indicates that DFEQX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TNSHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DFEQX | TNSHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.46% | 0.52% | -0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.66% | 1.23% | -0.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91% | 1.99% | -1.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.06% | 2.22% | -0.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.70% | 1.80% | -0.10% |