PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFEB vs. DBE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFEB vs. DBE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - February (DFEB) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFEB achieves a 6.47% return, which is significantly lower than DBE's 78.87% return.


DFEB

1D
0.38%
1M
0.65%
6M
5.45%
YTD
6.47%
1Y
13.27%
3Y*
12.33%
5Y*
8.13%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.25%

DBE

1D
1.13%
1M
21.13%
6M
53.89%
YTD
78.87%
1Y
68.62%
3Y*
17.16%
5Y*
17.73%
10Y*
13.17%
ALL TIME*
2.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.24M$1.18M$1.76M
$443.21K$463.96K$645.86K

DFEB vs. DBE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
DFEB
FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - February
6.47%11.79%13.87%12.47%-5.41%8.83%6.09%
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
78.87%-2.17%2.96%-12.14%33.77%57.56%-15.25%

Correlation

The correlation between DFEB and DBE is -0.30, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2020

0.12

The correlation between DFEB and DBE shifts across timeframes, from -0.30 (1 year) to 0.12 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFEB vs. DBE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DFEB
DFEB Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
DFEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFEB Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
DFEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFEB Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

DBE
DBE Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
DBE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBE Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
DBE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBE Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DFEB vs. DBE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - February (DFEB) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DFEBDBEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.29

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.05

2.59

+0.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.51

8.14

+7.37

DFEB vs. DBE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFEB Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is higher than the DBE Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFEB and DBE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DFEB vs. DBE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFEB drawdown since its inception was -14.61%, smaller than the maximum DBE drawdown of -86.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFEB and DBE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFEBDBEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.61%

-86.69%

+72.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.09%

-24.72%

+20.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.33%

-24.72%

+16.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.02%

-38.74%

+28.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-32.09%

+32.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.03%

-57.13%

+55.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.80%

8.15%

-7.35%

Volatility

DFEB vs. DBE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - February (DFEB) is 1.37%, while Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE) has a volatility of 14.12%. This indicates that DFEB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFEBDBEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.37%

14.12%

-12.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.31%

33.95%

-29.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.49%

37.47%

-31.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.34%

30.09%

-22.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.89%

28.58%

-19.69%

DFEB vs. DBE - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFEB has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than DBE's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFEB vs. DBE - Dividend Comparison

DFEB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DBE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.16%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
2.16%3.86%6.32%3.87%0.75%0.00%0.00%1.79%1.67%
DFEB
FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - February
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFEB and DBE have a correlation of -0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBE has higher volatility (14.12%) compared to DFEB (1.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFEB dropped -14.61% vs DBE's -86.69%.

On 5-year performance, DBE leads with 17.73% vs 8.13% for DFEB. On fees, DBE is cheaper at 0.78% per year. On volatility, DFEB has been the lower-risk option at 1.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DBE has performed better with a 17.73% return vs 8.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DBE is cheaper with a 0.78% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DFEB.

DBE has the higher dividend yield at 2.16%, compared with 0.00% for DFEB.

DFEB is categorized as Defined Outcome, while DBE is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DFEB and 0.78% for DBE.

DFEB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFEB and DBE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer