DFDMX vs. SSMHX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DFDMX (DF Dent Midcap Growth Fund) and SSMHX (State Street Small/Mid Cap Equity Index Portfolio) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, DFDMX returned 8.88%/yr vs 11.94%/yr for SSMHX. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DFDMX charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for SSMHX.

Performance

DFDMX vs. SSMHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DF Dent Midcap Growth Fund (DFDMX) and State Street Small/Mid Cap Equity Index Portfolio (SSMHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFDMX achieves a -9.39% return, which is significantly lower than SSMHX's 14.18% return. Over the past 10 years, DFDMX has underperformed SSMHX with an annualized return of 8.88%, while SSMHX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.94% annualized return.

DFDMX

• 1D: -0.86%
• 1M: 1.42%
• YTD: -9.39%
• 6M: -10.62%
• 1Y: -8.97%
• 3Y*: 4.17%
• 5Y*: -1.11%
• 10Y*: 8.88%

SSMHX

• 1D: 1.00%
• 1M: 5.71%
• YTD: 14.18%
• 6M: 13.12%
• 1Y: 29.97%
• 3Y*: 18.16%
• 5Y*: 6.39%
• 10Y*: 11.94%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFDMX vs. SSMHX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DFDMX DF Dent Midcap Growth Fund	-9.39%	0.49%	11.15%	22.91%	-30.52%	12.26%	30.43%	40.14%	-0.24%	31.22%
SSMHX State Street Small/Mid Cap Equity Index Portfolio	14.18%	12.90%	10.73%	25.21%	-25.43%	13.08%	32.46%	28.00%	-9.21%	18.26%

Correlation

The correlation between DFDMX and SSMHX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.81
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 2015	0.87

The correlation between DFDMX and SSMHX shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.87 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

DFDMX vs. SSMHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFDMX

DFDMX Risk / Return Rank: 1
DFDMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
DFDMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
DFDMX Omega Ratio Rank: 1
DFDMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
DFDMX Martin Ratio Rank: 1

SSMHX

SSMHX Risk / Return Rank: 49
SSMHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
SSMHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
SSMHX Omega Ratio Rank: 37
SSMHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
SSMHX Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFDMX vs. SSMHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DF Dent Midcap Growth Fund (DFDMX) and State Street Small/Mid Cap Equity Index Portfolio (SSMHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DFDMX	SSMHX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.51	1.89	-2.39
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.62	2.64	-3.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.93	1.32	-0.39
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.36	3.18	-3.54
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.76	11.56	-12.31
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DFDMX vs. SSMHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFDMX Sharpe Ratio is -0.51, which is lower than the SSMHX Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFDMX and SSMHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DFDMX	SSMHX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.51	1.89	-2.39
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.05	0.29	-0.34
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.44	0.54	-0.10
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.49	0.48	+0.01

Drawdowns

DFDMX vs. SSMHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFDMX drawdown since its inception was -40.46%, roughly equal to the maximum SSMHX drawdown of -41.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFDMX and SSMHX.

Drawdown Indicators

	DFDMX	SSMHX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.46%	-41.61%	+1.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.32%	-10.03%	-12.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.32%	-30.38%	+8.06%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.46%	-34.84%	-5.62%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.46%	-41.61%	+1.15%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.52%	0.00%	-17.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.06%	-9.15%	+1.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.48%	2.76%	+7.72%

Volatility

DFDMX vs. SSMHX - Volatility Comparison

DF Dent Midcap Growth Fund (DFDMX) and State Street Small/Mid Cap Equity Index Portfolio (SSMHX) have volatilities of 4.77% and 4.70%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DFDMX	SSMHX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.77%	4.70%	+0.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.23%	12.36%	-0.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.78%	16.90%	-1.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.81%	22.41%	-1.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.45%	22.39%	-1.94%

DFDMX vs. SSMHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFDMX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than SSMHX's 0.02% expense ratio.

Dividends

DFDMX vs. SSMHX - Dividend Comparison

DFDMX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SSMHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.24%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DFDMX DF Dent Midcap Growth Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	2.79%	0.30%	0.87%	3.52%	0.30%	0.09%	3.21%
SSMHX State Street Small/Mid Cap Equity Index Portfolio	6.24%	7.12%	0.00%	1.56%	2.31%	16.30%	2.91%	3.65%	6.43%	4.01%	1.71%	0.73%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DFDMX and SSMHX in my portfolio?

DFDMX and SSMHX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DFDMX or SSMHX?

DFDMX has higher volatility (4.77%) compared to SSMHX (4.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFDMX dropped -40.46% vs SSMHX's -41.61%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SSMHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs -0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.