PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFDMX vs. PKSFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFDMX vs. PKSFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DF Dent Midcap Growth Fund (DFDMX) and Virtus KAR Small-Cap Core Fund (PKSFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFDMX achieves a -9.39% return, which is significantly lower than PKSFX's 3.17% return. Over the past 10 years, DFDMX has underperformed PKSFX with an annualized return of 8.88%, while PKSFX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.68% annualized return.


DFDMX

1D
-0.86%
1M
1.42%
YTD
-9.39%
6M
-10.62%
1Y
-8.97%
3Y*
4.17%
5Y*
-1.11%
10Y*
8.88%

PKSFX

1D
-0.10%
1M
-1.03%
YTD
3.17%
6M
3.35%
1Y
3.59%
3Y*
10.77%
5Y*
7.76%
10Y*
14.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFDMX vs. PKSFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DFDMX
DF Dent Midcap Growth Fund
-9.39%0.49%11.15%22.91%-30.52%12.26%30.43%40.14%-0.24%31.22%
PKSFX
Virtus KAR Small-Cap Core Fund
3.17%-2.58%13.67%32.32%-10.77%19.03%21.38%40.21%-1.99%34.98%

Correlation

The correlation between DFDMX and PKSFX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2011

0.85

The correlation between DFDMX and PKSFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFDMX vs. PKSFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFDMX
DFDMX Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
DFDMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFDMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFDMX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
DFDMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFDMX Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

PKSFX
PKSFX Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
PKSFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PKSFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
PKSFX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
PKSFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
PKSFX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFDMX vs. PKSFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DF Dent Midcap Growth Fund (DFDMX) and Virtus KAR Small-Cap Core Fund (PKSFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFDMXPKSFXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.51

0.30

-0.81

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.62

0.57

-1.19

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

1.06

-0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.36

0.41

-0.77

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.76

0.87

-1.63

DFDMX vs. PKSFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFDMX Sharpe Ratio is -0.51, which is lower than the PKSFX Sharpe Ratio of 0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFDMX and PKSFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFDMXPKSFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.51

0.30

-0.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.05

0.43

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.78

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.56

-0.07

Drawdowns

DFDMX vs. PKSFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFDMX drawdown since its inception was -40.46%, smaller than the maximum PKSFX drawdown of -54.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFDMX and PKSFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFDMXPKSFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.46%

-54.46%

+14.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.32%

-11.19%

-11.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.32%

-21.82%

-0.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.46%

-22.02%

-18.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.46%

-33.45%

-7.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.52%

-7.97%

-9.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.06%

-7.17%

-0.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.48%

5.34%

+5.14%

Volatility

DFDMX vs. PKSFX - Volatility Comparison

DF Dent Midcap Growth Fund (DFDMX) has a higher volatility of 4.77% compared to Virtus KAR Small-Cap Core Fund (PKSFX) at 4.22%. This indicates that DFDMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PKSFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFDMXPKSFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.77%

4.22%

+0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.23%

10.99%

+1.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.78%

15.31%

+0.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.81%

17.93%

+2.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.45%

18.83%

+1.62%

DFDMX vs. PKSFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFDMX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than PKSFX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFDMX vs. PKSFX - Dividend Comparison

DFDMX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PKSFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.86%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFDMX
DF Dent Midcap Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.79%0.30%0.87%3.52%0.30%0.09%3.21%
PKSFX
Virtus KAR Small-Cap Core Fund
13.86%14.30%4.07%4.12%6.65%12.05%7.45%4.03%4.33%0.17%5.69%19.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFDMX and PKSFX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DFDMX has higher volatility (4.77%) compared to PKSFX (4.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFDMX dropped -40.46% vs PKSFX's -54.46%.

PKSFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.30 vs -0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFDMX and PKSFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer