PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFCSX vs. EUGDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFCSX vs. EUGDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA Continental Small Company Portfolio (DFCSX) and Morgan Stanley Europe Opportunity Fund Inc. (EUGDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


DFCSX

1D
0.74%
1M
-0.80%
YTD
6.53%
6M
9.94%
1Y
16.09%
3Y*
16.77%
5Y*
5.89%
10Y*
9.55%

EUGDX

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFCSX vs. EUGDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DFCSX
DFA Continental Small Company Portfolio
6.53%37.58%0.20%16.93%-20.12%14.66%15.07%25.90%-19.67%34.77%
EUGDX
Morgan Stanley Europe Opportunity Fund Inc.
-4.82%11.93%12.41%25.16%-44.49%15.80%55.57%27.34%-13.02%23.11%

Correlation

The correlation between DFCSX and EUGDX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 1997

0.76

The correlation between DFCSX and EUGDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFCSX vs. EUGDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFCSX
DFCSX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
DFCSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFCSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFCSX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
DFCSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFCSX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

EUGDX
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFCSX vs. EUGDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Continental Small Company Portfolio (DFCSX) and Morgan Stanley Europe Opportunity Fund Inc. (EUGDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFCSXEUGDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.73

DFCSX vs. EUGDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFCSXEUGDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

Drawdowns

DFCSX vs. EUGDX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFCSXEUGDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.48%

Volatility

DFCSX vs. EUGDX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFCSXEUGDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.91%

DFCSX vs. EUGDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFCSX has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than EUGDX's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFCSX vs. EUGDX - Dividend Comparison

DFCSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%, more than EUGDX's 0.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFCSX
DFA Continental Small Company Portfolio
2.83%3.02%4.94%2.84%2.45%1.19%1.55%2.24%6.28%1.98%1.97%1.97%
EUGDX
Morgan Stanley Europe Opportunity Fund Inc.
0.66%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%5.45%7.53%3.27%1.02%0.90%2.75%2.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFCSX and EUGDX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFCSX and EUGDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer