DFCFX vs. SWSBX
Compare and contrast key facts about DFA Two-Year Fixed Income Portfolio (DFCFX) and Schwab Short-Term Bond Index Fund (SWSBX).
DFCFX is managed by Dimensional. It was launched on Jun 6, 1996. SWSBX is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Government/Credit 1-5 Year Index. It was launched on Feb 23, 2017.
Performance
DFCFX vs. SWSBX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DFCFX vs. SWSBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFCFX DFA Two-Year Fixed Income Portfolio | 0.89% | 2.28% | 5.33% | 4.92% | -3.28% | 8.60% | 0.57% | 2.65% | 1.78% | 0.61% |
SWSBX Schwab Short-Term Bond Index Fund | -0.27% | 6.06% | 3.42% | 3.95% | -5.89% | -1.28% | 4.47% | 4.96% | 1.34% | 0.85% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFCFX achieves a 0.89% return, which is significantly higher than SWSBX's -0.27% return.
DFCFX
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- YTD
- 0.89%
- 6M
- 1.87%
- 1Y
- 3.08%
- 3Y*
- 4.06%
- 5Y*
- 3.68%
- 10Y*
- 2.44%
SWSBX
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -1.23%
- YTD
- -0.27%
- 6M
- 0.88%
- 1Y
- 3.63%
- 3Y*
- 3.74%
- 5Y*
- 1.25%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DFCFX vs. SWSBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFCFX has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is higher than SWSBX's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
DFCFX vs. SWSBX — Risk / Return Rank
DFCFX
SWSBX
DFCFX vs. SWSBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Two-Year Fixed Income Portfolio (DFCFX) and Schwab Short-Term Bond Index Fund (SWSBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFCFX | SWSBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.59 | 1.71 | +0.88 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.98 | 2.83 | +0.15 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 3.80 | 1.36 | +2.44 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.07 | 2.79 | -0.71 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.56 | 10.25 | -4.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFCFX | SWSBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.59 | 1.71 | +0.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 | 0.42 | +0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.34 | 0.76 | +0.58 |
Correlation
The correlation between DFCFX and SWSBX is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
DFCFX vs. SWSBX - Dividend Comparison
DFCFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.94%, less than SWSBX's 3.79% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFCFX DFA Two-Year Fixed Income Portfolio | 2.94% | 2.16% | 4.90% | 3.43% | 1.32% | 8.29% | 0.67% | 2.22% | 1.87% | 1.22% | 0.79% | 0.53% |
SWSBX Schwab Short-Term Bond Index Fund | 3.79% | 4.09% | 3.66% | 2.36% | 1.11% | 0.97% | 1.82% | 2.41% | 2.12% | 1.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
DFCFX vs. SWSBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFCFX drawdown since its inception was -4.27%, smaller than the maximum SWSBX drawdown of -9.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFCFX and SWSBX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFCFX | SWSBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.27% | -9.06% | +4.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.03% | -1.54% | +0.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -4.27% | -9.06% | +4.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -4.27% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.23% | +1.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.26% | -1.81% | +1.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.38% | 0.42% | -0.04% |
Volatility
DFCFX vs. SWSBX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for DFA Two-Year Fixed Income Portfolio (DFCFX) is 0.15%, while Schwab Short-Term Bond Index Fund (SWSBX) has a volatility of 0.73%. This indicates that DFCFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SWSBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DFCFX | SWSBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.15% | 0.73% | -0.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.43% | 1.49% | -1.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.21% | 2.40% | -1.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.39% | 2.95% | +1.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.13% | 2.47% | +0.66% |