PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFCF vs. SCHI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFCF vs. SCHI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional Core Fixed Income ETF (DFCF) and Schwab 5-10 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFCF achieves a 0.56% return, which is significantly higher than SCHI's 0.42% return.


DFCF

1D
0.00%
1M
0.24%
YTD
0.56%
6M
0.61%
1Y
5.90%
3Y*
4.86%
5Y*
10Y*

SCHI

1D
0.00%
1M
0.23%
YTD
0.42%
6M
0.51%
1Y
6.47%
3Y*
6.12%
5Y*
1.39%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFCF vs. SCHI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
DFCF
Dimensional Core Fixed Income ETF
0.56%7.89%1.86%6.94%-14.48%0.23%
SCHI
Schwab 5-10 Year Corporate Bond ETF
0.42%9.47%3.32%8.97%-14.06%0.66%

Correlation

The correlation between DFCF and SCHI is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2021

0.95

The correlation between DFCF and SCHI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFCF vs. SCHI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFCF
DFCF Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
DFCF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFCF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFCF Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
DFCF Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFCF Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHI
SCHI Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
SCHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHI Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHI Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFCF vs. SCHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Core Fixed Income ETF (DFCF) and Schwab 5-10 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFCFSCHIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.49

1.57

-0.08

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.19

2.31

-0.13

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.28

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.06

2.09

-0.02

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.31

7.10

-0.79

DFCF vs. SCHI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFCF Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is comparable to the SCHI Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFCF and SCHI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFCFSCHIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.49

1.57

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.04

0.30

-0.26

Drawdowns

DFCF vs. SCHI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFCF drawdown since its inception was -19.56%, smaller than the maximum SCHI drawdown of -20.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFCF and SCHI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFCFSCHIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.56%

-20.67%

+1.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.79%

-3.01%

+0.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.05%

-6.14%

+1.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.27%

-1.14%

-0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.04%

-5.71%

-2.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.91%

0.88%

+0.03%

Volatility

DFCF vs. SCHI - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional Core Fixed Income ETF (DFCF) and Schwab 5-10 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHI) have volatilities of 1.38% and 1.33%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFCFSCHIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.38%

1.33%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.92%

3.10%

-0.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.98%

4.15%

-0.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.47%

6.66%

-0.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.47%

7.40%

-0.93%

DFCF vs. SCHI - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFCF has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHI's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DFCF vs. SCHI - Dividend Comparison

DFCF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.30%, less than SCHI's 5.04% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
DFCF
Dimensional Core Fixed Income ETF
4.30%4.48%4.61%4.51%3.27%0.16%0.00%0.00%
SCHI
Schwab 5-10 Year Corporate Bond ETF
5.04%4.99%5.11%4.27%3.10%1.93%2.31%0.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, DFCF and SCHI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DFCF has higher volatility (1.38%) compared to SCHI (1.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFCF dropped -19.56% vs SCHI's -20.67%.

On 3-year performance, SCHI leads with 6.12% vs 4.86% for DFCF. On fees, SCHI is cheaper at 0.05% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, SCHI has performed better with a 6.12% return vs 4.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHI is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for DFCF.

SCHI has the higher dividend yield at 5.04%, compared with 4.30% for DFCF.

DFCF is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while SCHI is Corporate Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for DFCF and 0.05% for SCHI.

SCHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFCF and SCHI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer