PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFCF vs. DDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFCF vs. DDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional Core Fixed Income ETF (DFCF) and Defined Duration 5 ETF (DDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFCF achieves a -0.42% return, which is significantly lower than DDV's 2.35% return.


DFCF

1D
-0.29%
1M
-1.24%
6M
-0.68%
YTD
-0.42%
1Y
2.24%
3Y*
4.66%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
0.03%

DDV

1D
-0.13%
1M
-0.06%
6M
1.60%
YTD
2.35%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$74.78K$50.90K$102.48K
$59.72M$50.71M$53.37M

DFCF vs. DDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
DFCF
Dimensional Core Fixed Income ETF
-0.42%0.26%
DDV
Defined Duration 5 ETF
2.35%0.47%

Correlation

The correlation between DFCF and DDV is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2025

0.75

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFCF vs. DDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DFCF
DFCF Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
DFCF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFCF Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFCF Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
DFCF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFCF Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

DDV

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DFCF vs. DDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Core Fixed Income ETF (DFCF) and Defined Duration 5 ETF (DDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DFCFDDVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.76

DFCF vs. DDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DFCF vs. DDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFCF drawdown since its inception was -19.56%, which is greater than DDV's maximum drawdown of -1.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFCF and DDV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFCFDDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.56%

-1.92%

-17.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.24%

-0.29%

-1.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.81%

-0.34%

-7.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.09%

Volatility

DFCF vs. DDV - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFCFDDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.95%

2.64%

+1.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.40%

2.64%

+3.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.40%

2.64%

+3.76%

DFCF vs. DDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFCF has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than DDV's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DFCF vs. DDV - Dividend Comparison

DFCF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.41%, more than DDV's 1.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
DDV
Defined Duration 5 ETF
1.62%0.42%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DFCF
Dimensional Core Fixed Income ETF
4.41%4.48%4.61%4.51%3.27%0.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFCF and DDV have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DFCF is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DFCF is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for DDV.

DFCF has the higher dividend yield at 4.41%, compared with 1.62% for DDV.

They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Discipline Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for DFCF and 0.25% for DDV.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFCF and DDV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer