PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFCEX vs. FQEMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFCEX vs. FQEMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA Emerging Markets Core Equity Fund (DFCEX) and Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series EM (FQEMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFCEX achieves a 25.19% return, which is significantly lower than FQEMX's 90.39% return.


DFCEX

1D
0.78%
1M
7.67%
YTD
25.19%
6M
27.73%
1Y
49.33%
3Y*
23.14%
5Y*
9.53%
10Y*
11.09%

FQEMX

1D
0.04%
1M
29.89%
YTD
90.39%
6M
100.76%
1Y
170.59%
3Y*
48.79%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFCEX vs. FQEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
DFCEX
DFA Emerging Markets Core Equity Fund
25.19%28.79%7.31%15.45%-16.44%-2.07%
FQEMX
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series EM
90.39%55.98%6.67%12.18%-20.68%0.32%

Correlation

The correlation between DFCEX and FQEMX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2021

0.86

The correlation between DFCEX and FQEMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFCEX vs. FQEMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFCEX
DFCEX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
DFCEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFCEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFCEX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
DFCEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFCEX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

FQEMX
FQEMX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
FQEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FQEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
FQEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
FQEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FQEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFCEX vs. FQEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Emerging Markets Core Equity Fund (DFCEX) and Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series EM (FQEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFCEXFQEMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.62

2.03

-0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.15

9.27

-5.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.47

36.36

-19.89

DFCEX vs. FQEMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFCEX Sharpe Ratio is 3.32, which is lower than the FQEMX Sharpe Ratio of 6.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFCEX and FQEMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFCEXFQEMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.32

6.33

-3.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

1.21

-0.77

Drawdowns

DFCEX vs. FQEMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFCEX drawdown since its inception was -64.58%, which is greater than FQEMX's maximum drawdown of -34.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFCEX and FQEMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFCEXFQEMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.58%

-34.46%

-30.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.12%

-18.93%

+6.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.74%

-18.93%

+2.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.61%

-10.78%

-1.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.04%

4.78%

-1.74%

Volatility

DFCEX vs. FQEMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DFA Emerging Markets Core Equity Fund (DFCEX) is 6.43%, while Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series EM (FQEMX) has a volatility of 13.31%. This indicates that DFCEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FQEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFCEXFQEMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.43%

13.31%

-6.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.07%

24.44%

-11.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.15%

27.74%

-12.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.70%

21.09%

-6.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.93%

21.09%

-5.16%

DFCEX vs. FQEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFCEX has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than FQEMX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFCEX vs. FQEMX - Dividend Comparison

DFCEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.35%, more than FQEMX's 1.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFCEX
DFA Emerging Markets Core Equity Fund
2.35%2.90%3.43%3.53%3.78%2.59%1.70%2.42%2.33%1.92%1.99%2.28%
FQEMX
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series EM
1.67%3.18%3.15%4.82%3.93%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFCEX and FQEMX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FQEMX has higher volatility (13.31%) compared to DFCEX (6.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFCEX dropped -64.58% vs FQEMX's -34.46%.

FQEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.33 vs 3.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFCEX and FQEMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer