DFCA vs. RMNY

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

DFCA (Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF) and RMNY (Rockefeller New York Municipal Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, DFCA returned 3.44% vs 7.03% for RMNY. Their 0.74 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. DFCA charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for RMNY.

Performance

DFCA vs. RMNY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF (DFCA) and Rockefeller New York Municipal Bond ETF (RMNY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFCA achieves a 0.46% return, which is significantly lower than RMNY's 2.22% return.

DFCA

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: -0.98%
• 6M: -0.37%
• YTD: 0.46%
• 1Y: 3.44%
• 3Y*: 2.56%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 2.45%

RMNY

• 1D: 0.49%
• 1M: -1.20%
• 6M: 1.87%
• YTD: 2.22%
• 1Y: 7.03%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 2.73%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DFCA Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF	$2.61M	$2.41M	$2.81M
RMNY Rockefeller New York Municipal Bond ETF	$107.54K	$72.20K	$98.19K

DFCA vs. RMNY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
DFCA Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF	0.46%	2.99%	0.39%
RMNY Rockefeller New York Municipal Bond ETF	2.22%	2.35%	0.80%

Correlation

The correlation between DFCA and RMNY is 0.65, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 13, 2024	0.74

The correlation between DFCA and RMNY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

DFCA vs. RMNY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DFCA

DFCA Risk / Return Rank: 64
DFCA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
DFCA Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
DFCA Omega Ratio Rank: 81
DFCA Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
DFCA Martin Ratio Rank: 45

RMNY

RMNY Risk / Return Rank: 76
RMNY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
RMNY Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
RMNY Omega Ratio Rank: 82
RMNY Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
RMNY Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DFCA vs. RMNY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF (DFCA) and Rockefeller New York Municipal Bond ETF (RMNY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DFCA	RMNY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.91	1.87	+0.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.70	2.73	-0.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.39	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.96	3.09	-1.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.62	10.61	-4.99

DFCA vs. RMNY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFCA Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the RMNY Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFCA and RMNY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DFCA vs. RMNY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFCA drawdown since its inception was -3.28%, smaller than the maximum RMNY drawdown of -5.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFCA and RMNY.

Drawdown Indicators

	DFCA	RMNY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.28%	-5.70%	+2.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.77%	-2.28%	+0.51%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.28%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.12%	-1.28%	+0.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.69%	-1.45%	+0.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.61%	0.66%	-0.05%

Volatility

DFCA vs. RMNY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF (DFCA) is 0.71%, while Rockefeller New York Municipal Bond ETF (RMNY) has a volatility of 1.21%. This indicates that DFCA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RMNY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DFCA	RMNY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.71%	1.21%	-0.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.45%	2.99%	-1.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.82%	3.77%	-1.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.46%	5.08%	-2.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.46%	5.08%	-2.62%

DFCA vs. RMNY - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFCA has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than RMNY's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

DFCA vs. RMNY - Dividend Comparison

DFCA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%, less than RMNY's 4.35% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
DFCA Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF	2.76%	2.86%	2.86%	1.24%
RMNY Rockefeller New York Municipal Bond ETF	4.35%	4.10%	1.31%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DFCA and RMNY in my portfolio?

DFCA and RMNY have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DFCA or RMNY?

RMNY has higher volatility (1.21%) compared to DFCA (0.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFCA dropped -3.28% vs RMNY's -5.70%.

Which ETF is better, DFCA or RMNY?

On 1-year performance, RMNY leads with 7.03% vs 3.44% for DFCA. On fees, DFCA is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, DFCA has been the lower-risk option at 0.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DFCA or RMNY?

Over the 1-year period, RMNY has performed better with a 7.03% return vs 3.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DFCA or RMNY?

DFCA is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for RMNY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DFCA or RMNY?

RMNY has the higher dividend yield at 4.35%, compared with 2.76% for DFCA.

What is the main difference between DFCA and RMNY?

They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Rockefeller. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for DFCA and 0.55% for RMNY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DFCA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.