DFCA vs. DFAC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DFCA (Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF) and DFAC (Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DFCA is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by Dimensional, while DFAC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, DFCA returned 5.05% vs 28.89% for DFAC. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DFCA charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for DFAC.

Performance

DFCA vs. DFAC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF (DFCA) and Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFCA achieves a 1.07% return, which is significantly lower than DFAC's 11.90% return.

DFCA

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: 0.54%
• YTD: 1.07%
• 6M: 1.46%
• 1Y: 5.05%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DFAC

• 1D: -0.67%
• 1M: 4.57%
• YTD: 11.90%
• 6M: 12.19%
• 1Y: 28.89%
• 3Y*: 20.56%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFCA vs. DFAC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
DFCA Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF	1.07%	2.99%	1.49%	2.59%
DFAC Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF	11.90%	15.66%	19.61%	10.26%

Correlation

The correlation between DFCA and DFAC is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.18
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2023	0.17

Return for Risk

DFCA vs. DFAC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFCA

DFCA Risk / Return Rank: 76
DFCA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
DFCA Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
DFCA Omega Ratio Rank: 91
DFCA Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
DFCA Martin Ratio Rank: 55

DFAC

DFAC Risk / Return Rank: 71
DFAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
DFAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
DFAC Omega Ratio Rank: 70
DFAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
DFAC Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFCA vs. DFAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF (DFCA) and Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DFCA	DFAC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.87	2.39	+0.48
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.24	3.31	+0.93
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.61	1.43	+0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.87	3.42	-0.55
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.29	15.17	-5.89
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DFCA vs. DFAC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFCA Sharpe Ratio is 2.87, which is comparable to the DFAC Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFCA and DFAC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DFCA	DFAC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.87	2.39	+0.48
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.13	0.71	+0.42

Drawdowns

DFCA vs. DFAC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFCA drawdown since its inception was -3.28%, smaller than the maximum DFAC drawdown of -23.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFCA and DFAC.

Drawdown Indicators

	DFCA	DFAC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.28%	-23.12%	+19.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.77%	-8.49%	+6.72%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-20.02%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.52%	-0.67%	+0.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.70%	-5.45%	+4.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.55%	1.91%	-1.36%

Volatility

DFCA vs. DFAC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF (DFCA) is 0.55%, while Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAC) has a volatility of 3.01%. This indicates that DFCA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DFCA	DFAC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.55%	3.01%	-2.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.30%	8.96%	-7.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.77%	12.15%	-10.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.48%	17.13%	-14.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.48%	17.13%	-14.65%

DFCA vs. DFAC - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFCA has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than DFAC's 0.17% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

DFCA vs. DFAC - Dividend Comparison

DFCA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, more than DFAC's 0.91% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
DFAC Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF	0.91%	0.97%	1.03%	1.20%	1.50%	0.88%
DFCA Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF	2.69%	2.86%	2.86%	1.24%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DFCA and DFAC in my portfolio?

DFCA and DFAC have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DFCA or DFAC?

DFAC has higher volatility (3.01%) compared to DFCA (0.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFCA dropped -3.28% vs DFAC's -23.12%.

Which ETF is better, DFCA or DFAC?

On 1-year performance, DFAC leads with 28.89% vs 5.05% for DFCA. On fees, DFAC is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, DFCA has been the lower-risk option at 0.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DFCA or DFAC?

Over the 1-year period, DFAC has performed better with a 28.89% return vs 5.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DFCA or DFAC?

DFAC is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for DFCA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DFCA or DFAC?

DFCA has the higher dividend yield at 2.69%, compared with 0.91% for DFAC.

What is the main difference between DFCA and DFAC?

DFCA is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while DFAC is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for DFCA and 0.17% for DFAC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DFCA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.87 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.