DFAX vs. DISV
DFAX (Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF) and DISV (Dimensional International Small Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DFAX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Country World ex USA Index, while DISV is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional. DFAX is passively managed, while DISV is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, DFAX returned 21.17%/yr vs 25.07%/yr for DISV. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DFAX charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for DISV.
Performance
DFAX vs. DISV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFAX achieves a 15.50% return, which is significantly higher than DISV's 12.07% return.
DFAX
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 2.61%
- YTD
- 15.50%
- 6M
- 18.24%
- 1Y
- 34.48%
- 3Y*
- 21.17%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DISV
- 1D
- 1.12%
- 1M
- 3.45%
- YTD
- 12.07%
- 6M
- 16.30%
- 1Y
- 35.13%
- 3Y*
- 25.07%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DFAX vs. DISV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFAX Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF | 15.50% | 35.42% | 4.78% | 16.66% | -10.92% |
DISV Dimensional International Small Cap Value ETF | 12.07% | 47.42% | 5.87% | 19.52% | -9.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFAX and DISV is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2022 | 0.93 |
The correlation between DFAX and DISV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
DFAX vs. DISV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DFAX
DISV
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Healthcare
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Real Estate
Financial Services
DFAX
DISV
Industrials
DFAX
DISV
Basic Materials
DFAX
DISV
Technology
DFAX
DISV
Consumer Cyclical
DFAX
DISV
Energy
DFAX
DISV
Healthcare
DFAX
DISV
Utilities
DFAX
DISV
Consumer Defensive
DFAX
DISV
Communication Services
DFAX
DISV
Real Estate
DFAX
DISV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFAX vs. DISV — Risk / Return Rank
DFAX
DISV
DFAX vs. DISV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAX) and Dimensional International Small Cap Value ETF (DISV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFAX | DISV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.43 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.12 | 2.78 | +0.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.33 | 10.50 | +1.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFAX | DISV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.34 | 2.44 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.95 | -0.30 |
Drawdowns
DFAX vs. DISV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFAX drawdown since its inception was -28.15%, which is greater than DISV's maximum drawdown of -26.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFAX and DISV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFAX | DISV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.15% | -26.77% | -1.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.11% | -12.69% | +1.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.89% | -14.15% | +0.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.76% | -1.40% | +0.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.67% | -4.90% | -1.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.80% | 3.35% | -0.55% |
Volatility
DFAX vs. DISV - Volatility Comparison
Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAX) has a higher volatility of 5.10% compared to Dimensional International Small Cap Value ETF (DISV) at 4.19%. This indicates that DFAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DISV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFAX | DISV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.10% | 4.19% | +0.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.67% | 11.72% | +0.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.82% | 14.45% | +0.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.98% | 17.36% | -1.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.98% | 17.36% | -1.38% |
DFAX vs. DISV - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFAX has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than DISV's 0.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFAX vs. DISV - Dividend Comparison
DFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.21%, less than DISV's 2.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFAX Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF | 2.21% | 2.58% | 2.98% | 3.01% | 3.30% | 1.40% |
DISV Dimensional International Small Cap Value ETF | 2.36% | 2.69% | 2.77% | 2.73% | 1.23% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, DFAX and DISV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
DFAX has higher volatility (5.10%) compared to DISV (4.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFAX dropped -28.15% vs DISV's -26.77%.
On 3-year performance, DISV leads with 25.07% vs 21.17% for DFAX. On fees, DFAX is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, DISV has been the lower-risk option at 4.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DISV has performed better with a 25.07% return vs 21.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DFAX is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for DISV.
DISV has the higher dividend yield at 2.36%, compared with 2.21% for DFAX.
DFAX is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while DISV is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for DFAX and 0.42% for DISV.
DISV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 2.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFAX and DISV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer