DFAX vs. AVNV

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

DFAX (Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF) and AVNV (Avantis All International Markets Value ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. DFAX is passively managed, while AVNV is actively managed. Over the past year, DFAX returned 34.48% vs 36.33% for AVNV. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. DFAX charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for AVNV.

Performance

DFAX vs. AVNV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAX) and Avantis All International Markets Value ETF (AVNV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFAX achieves a 15.50% return, which is significantly higher than AVNV's 14.54% return.

DFAX

• 1D: 0.24%
• 1M: 2.61%
• YTD: 15.50%
• 6M: 18.24%
• 1Y: 34.48%
• 3Y*: 21.17%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AVNV

• 1D: 0.24%
• 1M: 2.61%
• YTD: 14.54%
• 6M: 17.59%
• 1Y: 36.33%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFAX vs. AVNV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
DFAX Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF	15.50%	35.42%	4.78%	7.63%
AVNV Avantis All International Markets Value ETF	14.54%	39.93%	5.43%	9.62%

Correlation

The correlation between DFAX and AVNV is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.98
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2023	0.98

The correlation between DFAX and AVNV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

DFAX vs. AVNV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DFAX	AVNV
Financial Services	17.9%	24.2%
Industrials	16.1%	17.5%
Basic Materials	13.2%	14.2%
Technology	10.9%	8.6%
Consumer Cyclical	10.9%	11.1%
Energy	6.6%	10.4%
Healthcare	5.6%	3.3%
Utilities	4.2%	1.5%
Consumer Defensive	3.9%	3.4%
Communication Services	3.5%	4.3%
Real Estate	3.1%	1.6%

Return for Risk

DFAX vs. AVNV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFAX

DFAX Risk / Return Rank: 70
DFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
DFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
DFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 73
DFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
DFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 68

AVNV

AVNV Risk / Return Rank: 73
AVNV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
AVNV Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
AVNV Omega Ratio Rank: 78
AVNV Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
AVNV Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFAX vs. AVNV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAX) and Avantis All International Markets Value ETF (AVNV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DFAX	AVNV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.34	2.51	-0.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.14	3.37	-0.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.46	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.12	3.13	-0.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.33	12.12	+0.20
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DFAX vs. AVNV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is comparable to the AVNV Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFAX and AVNV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DFAX	AVNV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.34	2.51	-0.17
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.65	1.59	-0.94

Drawdowns

DFAX vs. AVNV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFAX drawdown since its inception was -28.15%, which is greater than AVNV's maximum drawdown of -13.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFAX and AVNV.

Drawdown Indicators

	DFAX	AVNV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.15%	-13.89%	-14.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.11%	-11.66%	+0.55%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.89%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.76%	-0.78%	+0.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.67%	-2.50%	-4.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.80%	3.00%	-0.20%

Volatility

DFAX vs. AVNV - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAX) has a higher volatility of 5.10% compared to Avantis All International Markets Value ETF (AVNV) at 4.63%. This indicates that DFAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVNV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DFAX	AVNV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.10%	4.63%	+0.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.67%	12.30%	+0.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.82%	14.52%	+0.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.98%	14.77%	+1.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.98%	14.77%	+1.21%

DFAX vs. AVNV - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFAX has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than AVNV's 0.34% expense ratio.

Dividends

DFAX vs. AVNV - Dividend Comparison

DFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.21%, less than AVNV's 2.85% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
AVNV Avantis All International Markets Value ETF	2.85%	3.14%	3.51%	1.64%	0.00%	0.00%
DFAX Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF	2.21%	2.58%	2.98%	3.01%	3.30%	1.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DFAX and AVNV in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.98, DFAX and AVNV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, DFAX or AVNV?

DFAX has higher volatility (5.10%) compared to AVNV (4.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFAX dropped -28.15% vs AVNV's -13.89%.

Which ETF is better, DFAX or AVNV?

On 1-year performance, AVNV leads with 36.33% vs 34.48% for DFAX. On fees, DFAX is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, AVNV has been the lower-risk option at 4.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DFAX or AVNV?

Over the 1-year period, AVNV has performed better with a 36.33% return vs 34.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DFAX or AVNV?

DFAX is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for AVNV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DFAX or AVNV?

AVNV has the higher dividend yield at 2.85%, compared with 2.21% for DFAX.

What is the main difference between DFAX and AVNV?

They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for DFAX and 0.34% for AVNV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AVNV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 2.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.