PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFAW vs. DFAI
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

DFAW vs. DFAI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional World Equity ETF (DFAW) and Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF (DFAI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DFAW vs. DFAI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
DFAW
Dimensional World Equity ETF
0.66%20.62%15.49%11.57%
DFAI
Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF
4.03%34.04%4.68%10.83%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFAW achieves a 0.66% return, which is significantly lower than DFAI's 4.03% return.


DFAW

1D
0.70%
1M
-4.68%
YTD
0.66%
6M
4.05%
1Y
23.11%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DFAI

1D
1.49%
1M
-4.63%
YTD
4.03%
6M
9.10%
1Y
29.81%
3Y*
16.70%
5Y*
9.76%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DFAW vs. DFAI - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFAW has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than DFAI's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

DFAW vs. DFAI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFAW
DFAW Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
DFAW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFAW Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFAW Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
DFAW Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFAW Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

DFAI
DFAI Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
DFAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFAI Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
DFAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFAI Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFAW vs. DFAI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional World Equity ETF (DFAW) and Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF (DFAI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFAWDFAIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.35

1.79

-0.44

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.98

2.44

-0.46

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.37

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.92

2.74

-0.82

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.17

10.73

-1.56

DFAW vs. DFAI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFAW Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is comparable to the DFAI Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFAW and DFAI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFAWDFAIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.35

1.79

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.35

0.75

+0.60

Correlation

The correlation between DFAW and DFAI is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

DFAW vs. DFAI - Dividend Comparison

DFAW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, less than DFAI's 2.37% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
DFAW
Dimensional World Equity ETF
1.73%1.71%1.47%0.42%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DFAI
Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF
2.37%2.45%2.72%2.64%2.72%2.06%0.09%

Drawdowns

DFAW vs. DFAI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFAW drawdown since its inception was -16.93%, smaller than the maximum DFAI drawdown of -27.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFAW and DFAI.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


DFAWDFAIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.93%

-27.44%

+10.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.24%

-10.95%

-1.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.51%

-6.23%

+0.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.76%

-5.21%

+3.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.56%

2.79%

-0.23%

Volatility

DFAW vs. DFAI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dimensional World Equity ETF (DFAW) is 5.67%, while Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF (DFAI) has a volatility of 6.97%. This indicates that DFAW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFAI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


DFAWDFAIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.67%

6.97%

-1.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.47%

10.65%

-1.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.15%

16.73%

+0.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.57%

15.81%

-1.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.57%

15.66%

-1.09%